| 28 Sep 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | * OK, I assumed this pkgsRocm would be just that diff mentioned in
that list is too expensive to generate on every eval, but that is also not really required, it can gradually be adapted to what is needed
Because we don't want huge amount of duplicate jobs on Hydra (even if the hashes are the same in them).
| 15:05:41 |
| Vladimír Čunát | 🤔 anyway, that was just a quick thought. Maybe someone will have a better suggestion. | 15:06:51 |
 hexa | recursing into pkgsRocm would duplicate eval time | 15:07:42 |
| hexa | * recursing into pkgsRocm would double eval time | 15:08:04 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I suspect we did have a tool for evaluating just a particular subset of attributes, but I'm not sure about efficiency. | 15:08:22 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Essentially, I meant to take whatever you propose for a separate jobset and plug it in. The cost shouldn't differ significantly. | 15:09:16 |
 7c6f434c | Ask ROCm-interested people to maintain release-rocm.nix with things they care about (which can be sometimes linted locally, but no need to check completeness on every eval), then import it in the main release? | 15:12:56 |
