!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

379 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.114 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
6 Feb 2026
@sinan:sinanmohd.comsinan 09:32:04
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatThis first step with "unsupported system type" is weird: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/320525368#tabs-buildsteps13:15:43
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI estimate ~5k aborted darwin jobs from these on staging-next-25.11 now.13:16:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* I estimate ~5k aborted darwin jobs from these on staging-next-25.11 now-ish.13:16:38
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* I estimate ~5k aborted darwin jobs from these on staging-next-25.11 now-ish (restarted now).13:16:46
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunat* I estimate ~5k aborted darwin jobs from these on staging-next-25.11 now-ish (restarted them now).13:16:49
@k900:0upti.meK900 @vcunat what's our capacity situation? I assume most of the jobs on -linux right now are fake? 17:27:51
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatnixpkgs.* jobs are, nixos.* jobs aren't.17:28:38
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatI'm pre-caching NixOS jobs for after the staging-next-25.11 merge already.17:28:54
@k900:0upti.meK900Uhh why do we have 60k jobs on nixos-25.11 then17:29:10
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm asking because I just merged a staging-nixos17:29:17
@vcunat:matrix.orgvcunatYes, that's it.17:29:19
@k900:0upti.meK900Anyway I'll just start an unstable-small and see how that goes17:30:45
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh god I'm dumb17:32:33
@k900:0upti.meK900I ran it too early17:32:47
@k900:0upti.meK900So I'm doing it again17:32:51
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when) check the config for nixos-25.11, it points to staging-next-25.11 right now 17:33:44
8 Feb 2026
@ma27:nicht-so.sexyma27 Any opinions from infra about https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/478109#discussion_r2720782908 ? 19:16:22
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)intriguing19:23:49
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)we don't currently have cgroups xp enabled19:27:39
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)iirc only lix has a working implementation at this time19:27:56
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)
commit ae6761b9fea22ac802ead7757d034665cb4e795e
Author: Martin Weinelt <hexa@darmstadt.ccc.de>
Date:   Sun Mar 2 23:04:26 2025 +0100

    builders: stop using cgroups for now
    
    They currently break the build of nixosTests.systemd-boot.extraEntries on
    lix 2.91.1 and nix 2.25.2 after the edk2 202502 upgrade.
    
    The test hangs in nixos-disk-image-aarch64-linux with
    > Press ESC in 5 seconds to skip startup.nsh or any other key to continue.
    > Press ESC in 4 seconds to skip startup.nsh or any other key to continue.
    > Press ESC in 3 seconds to skip startup.nsh or any other key to continue.
    > Press ESC in 2 seconds to skip startup.nsh or any other key to continue.
    > Press ESC in 1 seconds to skip startup.nsh or any other key to continue.
    > [hangs here]
    
    And aborting the test after it times out fails with
    
    > Aborted: error: deleting cgroup '/sys/fs/cgroup/system.slice/nix-daemon.service/nix-build-uid-30022': [Device or resource busy]
19:28:35
@k900:0upti.meK900 Ugh 19:29:02
@k900:0upti.meK900 Not a fan of the whole thing at all tbh 19:29:03
@k900:0upti.meK900 Bolting on more wacky nonsense on the test driver is not the way 19:29:04
@k900:0upti.meK900 But rewriting it to be actually good is spoons 19:29:06
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)have you looked at the implementation and is it wacky?19:30:05
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)* have you looked at the implementation and are you considering it wacky?19:30:11
@k900:0upti.meK900 A little and yes 19:30:19
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa (signing key rotation when)more lightweight tests would surely be appreciated19:30:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6