| 19 Feb 2025 |
 infinisil | @dgrig:erethon.com Wondering though, what's those 500 emails you're sending? | 09:12:40 |
 dgrig | The tl;dr is that the Nix@NGI team is reaching out to all the NGI funded project authors with a survey to figure out how best we can help them in order to have their software packaged with Nix or in general how Nix can be of help to them (for example their CI/CD). The parent issue tracking this is https://github.com/ngi-nix/summer-of-nix/issues/81 | 09:22:43 |
|  @idabzo:matrix.org joined the room. | 09:24:55 |
|  Ivan Mincik (imincik) joined the room. | 09:25:50 |
|  Kerstin (she/her) joined the room. | 10:29:42 |
 fricklerhandwerk | Nice! Kerstin (she/her) could surely use that | 12:02:47 |
| 20 Feb 2025 |
|  wamirez joined the room. | 18:42:23 |
| 21 Feb 2025 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Man, the continuous loads of aarch64-linux builds failing with "No space left on device". | 08:07:58 |
 hexa | bumped the tmpfs with another 32GB and added a workaround to kill stale build roots | 15:29:55 |
| hexa | wondering if we should replace the quasi unmanaged arm builder with an rx220 or if I should just reimage it with a new profile for the rx170 | 16:10:19 |
| hexa | 128GB vs 256 GB memory is the primary difference | 16:10:34 |
| hexa | given that the current design is for /tmpfs I'd feel more comfortable with 256GB | 16:10:55 |
| hexa | but if we limit the number of builds ~64GB tmpfs could work as well? not sure | 16:11:16 |
| hexa | wondering if the recipients have opted into receiving these mails | 16:18:16 |
| dgrig | CC fricklerhandwerk who should know more | 16:22:16 |
| @idabzo:matrix.org | Since we have an existing community relationship with the recipients and are not sending marketing, sales, or promotional offers, this falls under legitimate interest rather than unsolicited marketing communication. This means we are complying with EU regulations regarding electronic mail communication while respecting data protection rules and not sharing any data with third parties in accordance with GDPR. | 17:34:12 |
| 22 Feb 2025 |
| hexa | thank you for the clarification! | 03:45:23 |
 K900 | https://hydra.nixos.org/machines | 07:01:46 |
| K900 | I think we lost like half the builders | 07:01:50 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I believe we just didn't have (enough darwin) runnable steps at that point. | 07:22:18 |
| K900 | There were some in the queue | 07:24:10 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Yes, in queue, but not as in-memory runnable steps, right? | 07:25:31 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Builds ingestion isn't too fast. | 07:25:38 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Yes, in queue, but not as in-memory runnable steps, right? (by looking at graphs) | 07:26:00 |
| K900 | Coudl be | 07:27:10 |
| K900 | I've started a new eval on unstable-small because the current one is mostly stuck and 8 hours old | 07:35:50 |
| K900 | ...and just as I say that it starts making progress | 07:36:15 |
 Mic92 | emily: would you around when I would apply: https://github.com/NixOS/infra/pull/562 ? | 10:20:23 |
| Mic92 | * emily: Are you around by chance for me to apply: https://github.com/NixOS/infra/pull/562 ? | 10:21:09 |
| K900 | Wrong Emily | 10:22:07 |
