| 16 Oct 2025 |
raitobezarius | It's fine because this more about a lowerbound | 11:44:49 |
raitobezarius | * It's fine because this was more about a lowerbound | 11:44:53 |
raitobezarius | so what I'm reading is 2.5M/month-ish narinfos | 11:45:18 |
BMG | Confirmed, 0 results when looking for keys ending in .nar | 11:45:36 |
Vladimír Čunát | Lower bound would be more like: full rebuild (hundreds of thousands jobs) every three weeks, very roughly. | 11:46:04 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Lower bound would be more like: full rebuild (hundreds of thousands jobs) every three weeks, very roughly. At least that's how I would think about it. | 11:46:17 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Lower bound would be more like: full rebuild (hundreds of thousands jobs) every two weeks, very roughly. At least that's how I would think about it. | 11:46:48 |
BMG |  Download image.png | 11:47:28 |
BMG | This is the monthly rollup for .narinfo | 11:47:34 |
BMG |  Download image.png | 11:48:30 |
BMG | This is the monthly rollup for %.nar.% | 11:48:40 |
BMG | I'm gonna say something naive: shouldn't there be the same number of nars as narinfos? | 11:49:20 |
raitobezarius | i was going to call this out | 11:49:31 |
raitobezarius | i'm confused why #narinfo >>> #nars | 11:49:40 |
raitobezarius | but perhaps, nar uploads are averted | 11:49:49 |
BMG | Looks like about 500k or so more narinfos a month than nars | 11:49:52 |
raitobezarius | and narinfos are rewritten no matter what | 11:49:53 |
BMG | Now I know the upload process is "messy" | 11:50:01 |
raitobezarius | :"D | 11:50:06 |
BMG | Less messy, more very simple. Not atomic. You can have a nar without a narinfo or vice versa because they are uploaded independently | 11:50:48 |
BMG | These numbers would seem to indicate something is not quite right with the upload process. | 11:51:09 |
BMG | I'm spending my afternoons on this stuff at the min. I'm gonna grab some lunch and dig into this properly. Need to brush up on my clickhouse skills a bit. | 11:51:58 |