!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

382 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.116 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 Jan 2025
@k900:0upti.meK900No15:50:04
@sliedes:hacklab.fiSami LiedesOk.15:50:15
@k900:0upti.meK900It's evaluating snapshots of master on a fixed timer15:50:23
@sliedes:hacklab.fiSami LiedesThat didn't sound like it should work at Nix scale :)15:50:24
@k900:0upti.meK900It could have, if we had incremental evaluation15:50:35
@k900:0upti.meK900Which I think is something that has been brought up before on the Lix side15:50:46
@k900:0upti.meK900But that's a whole other can of worms15:50:52
@sliedes:hacklab.fiSami Liedes Yeah... I think a lot of things that are less than perfect in the Nix world seem to come down to having a better Nix or tooling around it. 15:51:21
@dgrig:erethon.comdgrig

Hello! The Nix@NGI team would like to send some emails from a @nixos.org address in the near future. Based on https://github.com/NixOS/infra/pull/511 and https://github.com/NixOS/infra/issues/485 I understand we don't have this capability currently. Am I missing something or is this the case?

If it's the latter, what are our options here? Can I help somehow (with code reviews or writing code) to move this forward or is the best course of action to wait for the mentioned ETA in #410 and send emails from a non-nixos.org address until then?

16:51:14
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterthat’s possible - i was talking to valentin about this just a few minutes ago16:53:11
@fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgfricklerhandwerk

To be clear, we need two independent things:

  • team members receiving emails over a nixos.org address
  • reliably mailing to numerous contacts from the nixos.org address
17:08:17
@fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgfricklerhandwerk *

To be clear, we need two independent things:

  • team members receiving emails over a nixos.org address (ideally somewhat easy to keep up to date who's in the recipient list)
  • reliably mailing to numerous contacts from the nixos.org address
17:08:40
@fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgfricklerhandwerk *

To be clear, we need two independent things:

  • team members receiving emails over a nixos.org address (should be somewhat easy to keep up to date who's in the recipient list, ideally eventually auto-synced with whatever mechanism is available for managing teams)
  • reliably mailing to numerous contacts from the nixos.org address
17:09:11
@fricklerhandwerk:matrix.orgfricklerhandwerk *

To be clear, we need two independent things:

  • team members receiving emails to a team's nixos.org address (should be somewhat easy to keep up to date who's in the recipient list, ideally eventually auto-synced with whatever mechanism is available for managing teams)
  • reliably mailing to numerous contacts from the nixos.org address
17:09:24
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinCan someone bump https://hydra.nixos.org/build/287227270 https://hydra.nixos.org/build/287219458 https://hydra.nixos.org/build/287218582 https://hydra.nixos.org/build/287220720 After they're built nixos-unstable will advance21:49:34
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadone21:50:27
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinThanks21:54:43
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin Welp I was looking at the wrong place (status of tested) instead of queued jobs of trunk-combined, will be a while before the channel advances 11387. 22:02:45
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturinrestarted the acme test 5 times to get it to succeed22:03:47
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)

dgrig, you've correctly identified the state of things. The summary at the top of https://github.com/NixOS/infra/issues/485 is accurate. We need to set up some alerts for the mailserver. I just haven't taken the time to familiarize myself with prometheus and the blackbox alerting we have set up on pluto. I don't think there's a lot of work remaining there.

Here's an idea that feels low risk: we could set up this new mailserver to send emails alongside our existing improvmx account. That would let us start to test out this arrangment without breaking any existing send accounts.

23:26:19
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)

For receiving, we have to either:

  • complete the rollout
  • OR, use improvmx to set up additional mailing lists

Do you have a sense of the timeline you're working on here?

23:27:10
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)

team members receiving emails to a team's nixos.org address (should be somewhat easy to keep up to date who's in the recipient list, ideally eventually auto-synced with whatever mechanism is available for managing teams)

This is news to me. Is this github teams? Or something TBD that'll be used for sign-on to our new grist service?

23:28:40
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinterimprovmx can send emails already23:28:41
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)yes, that's also definitely an option. i was just thinking this could be a nice, low-risk opportunity to test out the new mailservef23:29:05
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)* yes, that's also definitely an option. i was just thinking this could be a nice, low-risk opportunity to test out the new mailserver23:29:06
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter“reliable delivery” != “low-risk” ;)23:29:17
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter * 23:29:49
@winter:catgirl.cloudWinter
In reply to @jfly:matrix.org

team members receiving emails to a team's nixos.org address (should be somewhat easy to keep up to date who's in the recipient list, ideally eventually auto-synced with whatever mechanism is available for managing teams)

This is news to me. Is this github teams? Or something TBD that'll be used for sign-on to our new grist service?

he means github teams || whatever alternate mechanism exists, if any, which i’m pretty sure the answer is “no” to
23:30:04
@jfly:matrix.orgJeremy Fleischman (jfly)Sure, I just mean it would be nice to test with 1 brand new send address rather than all of them. But totally acknowledge there's risk here, and an annoyingly hard one to anticipate ahead of time.23:30:44
@dgrig:erethon.comdgrig

I don't have an exact timeline, but I think it would be around sometime next week.

If improvmx can send emails then it's good enough for this usecase now I think and there's no need to worry about potential issues with the new setup.

23:37:21

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6