!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

453 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.141 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 May 2026
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátLooks OK to me.10:21:16
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátDoing debuginfo now.10:21:25
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(uploads of redirects to S3)10:21:40
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátMaybe this step isn't parallelized enough, as S3 has latency 200-250 ms per operation.10:22:57
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* Maybe this step isn't parallelized enough, as S3 has latency 200-250 ms per operation (goes overseas).10:23:17
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* Maybe this step isn't parallelized enough, as S3 has latency 200-250 ms per operation (.de -> USA).10:23:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát nixos-unstable-small advanced now. 10:26:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátFor reference, we're still plagued by repeated S3 abortions: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/329544227#tabs-buildsteps11:48:16
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* For reference, we're still plagued by repeated S3 upload abortions: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/329544227#tabs-buildsteps11:48:26
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)Eh, shall the old queue runner be resurrected on some other hydra branch so that we could fix this by adding more retries in nix?12:06:32
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)Since hydra master doesn’t seem to be ready at all and there’s need to fix this in the meantime. Probably the wrong channel for this though12:08:21
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát

We're at

github:NixOS/hydra/a40d42862da88cce78a27dd594e1484a034aac4d
12:13:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát coupled with github:NixOS/nix/2.34-maintenance 12:14:45
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát effectively we have github:NixOS/hydra/infra 12:16:15
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)Hm ok so if we add more retries to 2.34 branch it would help12:16:37
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátYou don't need to push it into that branch. It suffices to create a commit on that branch (to avoid too many changes) and we can switch to it easily.12:17:29
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * You don't need to push it into that branch. It suffices to create a commit on that branch (to avoid too many changes) and we can switch to it easily. 12:17:45
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)Ok, I’ll try to get to that this/next week12:19:20
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThanks. Ping us e.g. in this chat 🙂12:20:10
@xokdvium:matrix.orgSergei Zimmerman (xokdvium)In the meantime it might be possible to cleanly cherry-pick https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/15855, but I’m not sure how robust it is12:21:22
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátIt does not apply cleanly.12:30:01
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(and I don't know the codebase, so I don't dare trying to resolve this)12:30:19
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathat is the plan already13:15:23
@fovir:matrix.fovir.fyiFovir joined the room.15:42:14
@mynacol:mynacol.xyzmynacolDid you check if going over IPv6 would help? (You need a non-default dualstack hostname). From the error messages, I don't think so, but maybe worth a try.18:37:06
22 May 2026
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI don't think we have tried that.03:38:00
@vinceff:matrix.orgVinceffHello, just a quick question, is there any news about GNOME 50? Nixos 26.05 is supposed to be released next week or the week after at the latest, and there's no news about GNOME in unstable. 🥺08:14:58
@k900:0upti.meK900It has been merged with staging-next AFAIK?08:15:24
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátYes.08:15:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátSo it's just about channel updates which makes the question on-topic actually 😁08:16:01

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6