!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

432 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.133 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
8 May 2026
@figsoda:matrix.orgfigsodathat might have been why01:11:40
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátNetlify runs on some AWS?06:29:39
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát The last nixos-unstable eval got cancelled for some reason? 07:54:48
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(10 minutes ago, I think)07:54:59
@leona:leona.isleonayes, we will have a new one with the new kernels07:55:11
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* (10 minutes ago, I think; I'm just curious)07:55:16
@leona:leona.isleonait doesnt make sense to rebuild all nixos tests just to do it again in a few hours07:55:27
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátDirty Frag patches already?07:55:35
@leona:leona.isleonacorrect, https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/51796207:55:40
@leona:leona.isleonacurrently building them on my machine07:55:50
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátOK, good call to cancel early.07:56:09
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát-small will be the primary targets, but it still didn't make sense to do lots of NixOS tests builds before that update.07:57:15
@leona:leona.isleonaI started a new unstable-small eval, Kernel fix is merged to master08:36:56
@k900:0upti.meK900Also booped the automerge08:38:12
@k900:0upti.meK900So -next catches up08:38:21
@jopejoe1:matrix.orgjopejoe1 changed their display name from jopejoe1 (4094@epvpn) to jopejoe1.08:43:04
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát OK, though kernels will probably update again anyway before staging-next gets to master. 08:45:40
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * Sounds good, though kernels will probably update again anyway before staging-next gets to master. 08:46:18
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm trying to build my stuff against staging-next now08:55:07
@k900:0upti.meK900Cause I have no spoons and a lot of compute08:55:16
@hxr404:tchncs.de@hxr404:tchncs.de left the room.09:20:34
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianSo our storage cost in S3 is going down due to the GC. However our egress bandwidth cost are growing faster than the storage cost is shrinking. I think AI scraping is killing us perhaps 10:09:08
@arianvp:matrix.orgArian2 years ago egress bandwidth was 3.5k per month. . It's 6.2k per month now10:09:48
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianI think in one month we'll be paying more for egress bandwidth than storage10:10:12
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianThat sounds really off to me. 10:10:17
@arianvp:matrix.orgArian1000065300.jpg
Download 1000065300.jpg
10:11:44
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianRed line is egress bandwidth10:11:51
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianIt's hockey sticking 10:11:57
@jappie:jappie.devjappiedoes that mean that the amount of requests for stuff that isn't cached by fastly is growing (perhaps scrapers stumbling upon old derivations)? because I'd assume an uptick in users downloading new-ish derivations would mean more hits in fastly and no noticeable growth in S3 egress10:17:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI think so10:18:23

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6