| 21 Jun 2026 |
raitobezarius | so there's plenty of time to insert a curl-lix hack fix | 17:59:24 |
raitobezarius | but I'm not going to do it | 17:59:34 |
raitobezarius | either way, you are free to proceed under your preferred timelines and options | 18:00:10 |
raitobezarius | i suppose that if no fix is provided, all Lix users under 26.05 will have to undergo disaster recovery procedures because updates will no longer be possible | 18:00:32 |
raitobezarius | hmmm, but also the unit test hang so it's also a protection against upgrade for all 26.05 users | 18:01:08 |
raitobezarius | so it's even less important than expected, not a reason to hold up non-Lix users | 18:01:30 |
hexa | New queue runner, no idea | 18:29:16 |
hexa | Looks like we restarted all failed | 18:31:23 |
hexa | So merge delayed by a few hours | 18:31:37 |
hexa | Could be less than a day from what I have seen | 18:44:20 |
| @wegank:matrix.org joined the room. | 18:53:30 |
| @wegank:matrix.org left the room. | 18:54:13 |
K900 | channel-scripts dead? | 19:04:18 |
K900 | unstable-small has a build but no channel bump | 19:04:24 |
K900 | OK so it works | 20:44:17 |
K900 | Just VERY SLOWLY | 20:44:19 |
Lun | I can't figure out what dep failed for https://hydra.nixos.org/build/331652461#tabs-summary | 21:07:51 |
Mic92 | hexa (signing key rotation when): I assume you rolled up the nix-index bump for nix-channel scripts? https://github.com/NixOS/infra/pull/1094 | 22:02:04 |
Mic92 | I haven't actually checked if zstd was the issue for thing being slow. | 22:02:22 |
hexa | you mean deployed? I think so | 22:02:22 |
hexa | I haven't looked at the infra all day tbh | 22:02:34 |
Mic92 | * I haven't actually checked if zstd was the issue for the thing being slow. | 22:02:34 |
hexa | the next big bump is nixos-26.05 | 22:02:41 |
Mic92 | Alright. if we see it still being slow, I can attach to the machine and check what is going on | 22:03:12 |
Mic92 | would a rebuild help? I improved the error message here: https://github.com/NixOS/hydra/commit/4b62918515e630de6f7f1b74765ecc092d8845b6 | 22:04:53 |
Mic92 | Also I haven't done anything about the DependencyFailed error not having enough context | 22:06:24 |
Lun | rebuilt, still not seeing what the failed dep for it is.
Failed: Build failure: build failed: DependencyFailed: Cannot build '/nix/store/gxfzj17rq3m7q0d41j18ny3m9ppvhh5c-hipcc-22.0.0-rocm.drv'. Reason: 1 dependency failed. Output paths: /nix/store/h8hpmq8gxb9iapnp8mi70l2g5m7dpdrh-hipcc-22.0.0-rocm
| 22:06:38 |
Mic92 | Ah. This is actually coming from nix | 22:07:58 |
Mic92 | I have to compare how nix comes up with its error message | 22:08:25 |
Mic92 | not so intuitive at all, but for now you can see that the clang build below was failing. I have to think a bit about where I should put the dependency chain in the best case. | 22:19:31 |