!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

422 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.132 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
14 Oct 2021
@k900:0upti.meK900But I'd rather delay the release than release without cached binaries for the second biggest platform12:13:04
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn That's not really a great option without a solution in sight though. 12:14:19
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Have many uncached expressions already made it into the unstable channel? 12:14:39
@k900:0upti.meK900Lots, it seems12:14:49
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Because these are the kinds of things that would usually hold back channel bumps. 12:15:08
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Which channel are you on? 12:15:16
@k900:0upti.meK900nixpkgs-unstable12:15:24
@k900:0upti.meK900It looks like the CDN doesn't update when there are uncached expressions12:15:36
@k900:0upti.meK900But Github does12:15:38
@k900:0upti.meK900And I'm using flakes so I'm getting whatever is on Github12:15:44
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Ah, you're not actually using channels. You should pin your inputs to avoid things like this. Tracking master like that can always cause cache misses. 12:16:34
@k900:0upti.meK900I'm not tracking master, I'm tracking the nixpkgs-unstable branch12:16:52
@k900:0upti.meK900And it's all pinned anyway cause flakes12:16:59
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn That's not much different though. 12:17:03
@k900:0upti.meK900Can you actually tell nix flake to track the CDN?12:17:23
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)Nah, the nixpkgs-unstable *branch* should follow the channel 12:17:24
@k900:0upti.meK900 All the examples I've seen just use github:nixos/nixpkgs 12:17:32
@k900:0upti.meK900Which is how I ended up here12:17:42
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)The branch is, iirc, updated by the same infrastructure that updates the channel definitions anyway12:17:59
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Ah, there's no release-unstable? I know the branch naming isn't intuitive with the stable branches. 12:18:04
@k900:0upti.meK900nixpkgs-unstable the branch seems to follow the nixpkgs-unstable Hydra job at least12:18:29
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)You say that you're missing rustc from nixpkgs-unstable though?12:19:31
@k900:0upti.meK900Yes12:20:25
@k900:0upti.meK900Oh god wait I might be an idiot12:26:29
@k900:0upti.meK900OK no I'm not12:27:08
@k900:0upti.meK900It is building the right branch12:27:14
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn I guess rustc may not be in the set of things that need to be fully evaluated before the channel advances. 12:28:28
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Which is a bit unfortunate since sphinx has started depending on it and tons of stuff depends on that for documentation. 12:28:52
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)https://p.lukegb.com/MildlyDaringHoneybee.txt looks fine to me12:28:58
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)what attrpath are you trying to build?12:30:22

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6