| 15 Jun 2026 |
 K900 | OK wait never mind I think I got myself IP banned somehow | 07:23:25 |
| K900 | OK wait never mind again | 07:24:28 |
| K900 | 
Download image.png | 07:24:30 |
| K900 | It definitely restarted itself | 07:24:33 |
 Vladimír Čunát | Yes, that's my doing. | 07:26:47 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Upgrading. | 07:26:50 |
|  nene127 joined the room. | 09:10:06 |
| nene127 changed their display name from Samuele Facenda to nene127. | 09:10:28 |
| 16 Jun 2026 |
 hexa |
Warning: Identity file /var/lib/hydra-queue-runner/.ssh/id_ed25519 not accessible: No such file or directory.
| 01:19:55 |
| hexa | saw that on a job that was connecting | 01:20:08 |
| hexa | does it always check the wrong place? | 01:20:19 |
| hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 01:20:20 |
 linj | The nixos-unstable-small channel seems too small to me. Most of these listed packages are not added to the tested job. But from the git history, it seems they should be added to the tested job. | 04:40:25 |
| linj | Looks like a bug. I can make a PR if it is indeed a bug | 04:40:44 |
| linj | Among those packages, only a few are added to tested. | 04:42:14 |
| linj | If it is not a bug, I would recommend those packages which are not added to tested to reduce confusion. | 04:51:01 |
| linj | * If it is not a bug, I would recommend removing those packages which are not added to tested to reduce confusion. | 04:51:12 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I assume the idea was to ensure they get built but not blocking on them. | 05:09:23 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Still, the list of nixpkgs.* jobs could certainly be expanded. That should be fairly cheap. | 05:09:51 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * Still, the list of nixpkgs.* jobs among -small blockers could certainly be expanded. That should be fairly cheap. | 05:10:07 |
| linj | so just listing them in nixpkgs also affects hydra somehow? might be worth a comment for people like me who are not familiar with hydra | 05:11:44 |
| Vladimír Čunát | They get a job. | 05:12:34 |
| Vladimír Čunát | i.e. you can see them in https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1826306 | 05:12:51 |
| Vladimír Čunát | So nixos-unstable-small waits for them to finish, but not necessarily to succeed. | 05:13:30 |
| Vladimír Čunát | Overall the channel blocker lists seem undermaintained. | 05:14:08 |
| Vladimír Čunát | It would be nice if we had some good data on usage and chose based on that. | 05:15:12 |
| linj | Another quick question: why there is no aarhc64-linux packages in the nixpkgs-unstable channel blocker but there are in the nixos-unstable channel blocker? | 05:41:14 |
| linj | * Another quick question: why are there no aarch64-linux packages in the nixpkgs-unstable channel blocker? There are aarch64-linux packages in the nixos-unstable channel blocker. | 05:42:00 |
| Vladimír Čunát | 🤔 that seems weird to me. | 05:45:42 |
| Vladimír Čunát | But you're right: https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/unstable/unstable#tabs-constituents | 05:45:57 |
