!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

422 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.132 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
13 Oct 2021
@piper:lutris.engineeringPiper McCorkle (she/her or they/them)I am realizing from experience how slow it is... unfortunately I don't know if there's a better option without having a native buildbox, and it would be hard to get a dedicated buildbox for these exotic architectures08:23:32
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniDoes it sound plausible that some Hydra builders are running a Kernel < 5.9?10:18:51
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
Does it sound plausible that some Hydra builders are running a Kernel < 5.9?
t4b does. Generally we probably don't want to rely on that in builds.
10:20:24
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni Vladimír Čunát: bingo :) https://hydra.nixos.org/build/154918256/nixlog/2 10:25:20
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsternibut that's easy I'll just disable the test suite if the kernel is too old10:25:41
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát I suspected it's the only one with old kernel. But I don't think there's just hydra.nixos.org; we also want people to be able to reproduce the build, and 5.9 isn't that old nowadays. 10:27:59
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * I suspected it's the only one with old kernel. But I don't think there's just hydra.nixos.org; we also want people to be able to reproduce the build, and 5.9 isn't that old nowadays (even though 5.10 has been default on NixOS for some time). 10:28:41
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Uhm, so I had a job aborted earlier and I started a new evaluation after pushing some more commits but most of the jobs have already "finished" as being aborted. Why is this and can I get them unaborted? 19:32:04
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn *An evaluation aborted rather, I guess. 19:33:48
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni toonn: if they are still the same (hash) they are still aborted 19:37:48
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniI can just restart all aborted ones again19:37:54
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni * I can just restart all aborted ones again if you link me the evaluation19:38:04
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn But how would that happen? The commits I pushed touch sphinx. Which caused 1000's of failures before. So I'd expect it to change 1000's of hashes now : s 19:42:11
@r-burns:matrix.orgRyan Burns toonn: you modified the extraPostFetch but didn't change the FOD hash so no hashes changed and nothing will be rebuilt 19:51:58
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Right... >.< Ok, then I do need the aborted jobs restarted : ) 19:59:56
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn FODs are really a lot less straightforward than I thought they were. 20:00:39
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátRestarted https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1713061 which you apparently meant.20:08:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátThe original motivation of FOD was to avoid rebuild when fetcher is changed, I believe (e.g. URL moves).20:09:31
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Thanks. Yeah, they certainly have their uses. It's just that the implications seem obvious and yet they still bite me time and again : ) 20:10:55
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Excellent, now we wait. (Mr Burns pose.) 20:13:27
@r-burns:matrix.orgRyan Burnslol. I was eagerly watching some of the jobs and they've all gotten stuck in sending inputs now. pikachu face20:58:41
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn How can you tell? (I'm still not very familiar with interpreting Hydra web interface.) 21:02:52
@r-burns:matrix.orgRyan Burnsper job here https://hydra.nixos.org/status or per machine here https://hydra.nixos.org/machines21:10:35
@toonn:matrix.orgtoonn Ah, TIL. That's a much closer eye than I've kept so far : ) 21:16:24
14 Oct 2021
@k900:0upti.meK900Is anyone looking into the Darwin builder thing?11:25:12
@k900:0upti.meK900I don't want to build rustc from source :(11:25:24
@lukegb:zxcvbnm.ninjalukegb (he/him)At the current rate, we're going to have a 21.11 release without x86_64-darwin builds, I'm afraid11:31:21
@moritz.hedtke:matrix.orgmoritz.hedtkeWouldn't it be possible to run a build manually (with nix-build) on one of the idle ones (and probably disable it in hydra). I could image that would actually be faster. Although I don't know how it would get in the cache then or if there is some other flaw in that12:03:57
@moritz.hedtke:matrix.orgmoritz.hedtkeInvestigating what's from is of course way more useful. Also this wouldn't update the channels in the end I assume and if hydra fails before building (which it seems to me) you couldn't even rerun a build there then12:07:30
@moritz.hedtke:matrix.orgmoritz.hedtke* Investigating what's wrong is of course way more useful. Also this wouldn't update the channels in the end I assume and if hydra fails before building (which it seems to me) you couldn't even rerun a build there then12:07:48

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6