| 3 Oct 2021 |
 lukegb (he/him) | hmm, still very few x86_64-linux runners | 00:53:46 |
| lukegb (he/him) | grahamc (he/him): any chance you can look into why we have so few packet runners? can we schedule some in a different metro if it's just a lack of availability in AMS? | 00:54:12 |
| lukegb (he/him) | s/packet/equinix metal/ etc. | 00:54:21 |
| 4 Oct 2021 |
 Jonas Chevalier | Currently importing all the DNS records into terraform: https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-org-configurations/pull/176
It's a manual process that involves deleting an re-creating the records so there might be some mistakes. I'm going to be extra careful. | 12:38:58 |
|  Janne Heß joined the room. | 13:15:12 |
|  K900 joined the room. | 13:16:03 |
| K900 | In reply to @zimbatm:numtide.com
Currently importing all the DNS records into terraform: https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-org-configurations/pull/176
It's a manual process that involves deleting an re-creating the records so there might be some mistakes. I'm going to be extra careful. Uhh, I think status.nixos.org is currently borked on ipv4... | 13:16:27 |
| K900 | And this might be related | 13:16:36 |
| K900 left the room. | 13:18:09 |
| K900 joined the room. | 13:18:16 |
| K900 | Oops | 13:18:20 |
| Jonas Chevalier | I just noticed that status.nixos.org both has a A record, and a NETLIFY record | 13:18:59 |
| K900 | I don't really know much about how Netlify works, but right now status.nixos.org and monitoring.nixos.org both resolve to the same IPv4 | 13:19:47 |
| Jonas Chevalier | planet.nixos.org has a A, CNAME and NETLIFY record | 13:19:48 |
| K900 | And both redirect to https://status.nixos.org/ | 13:19:54 |
| K900 | Which loops forever | 13:19:56 |
| K900 | This is using Cloudflare's name servers so shouldn't be ISP fuckery | 13:20:43 |
| Janne Heß left the room. | 13:27:10 |
| Jonas Chevalier | tracking here: https://github.com/NixOS/nixos-org-configurations/issues/177 | 13:35:18 |
| Jonas Chevalier | both the old A record and the new NETLIFY records were living side-by-side. This should be fixed now once DNS propagates (~1h) | 13:40:51 |
| K900 | Thanks, seems good now :) | 13:54:13 |
|  Baughn joined the room. | 19:52:20 |
| Baughn | The iso files for the gnome desktop, as well as both minimal installation images on nixos.org don't match their sha256sums. | 19:52:51 |
 Vladimír Čunát | The sums are for a different commit than the actual ISOs. | 19:56:56 |
| Vladimír Čunát | For minimal I see:
21.05.3509.7daf35532d2
21.05.3468.92609f3d9bc | 19:57:39 |
| Baughn | Mmyep. There's the bug. | 19:58:34 |
| Vladimír Čunát | I wonder if it's possible that these redirect pairs aren't guaranteed to be "cached atomically" by Fastly or something. | 19:59:41 |
|  Linux Hackerman joined the room. | 19:59:42 |
|  djacu joined the room. | 19:59:51 |
| Vladimír Čunát | * I wonder if it's possible that these redirect pairs aren't guaranteed to be "cached atomically" by Fastly or something. (well, I don't know this stuff) | 20:00:08 |
