!RROtHmAaQIkiJzJZZE:nixos.org

NixOS Infrastructure

477 Members
Next Infra call: 2024-07-11, 18:00 CEST (UTC+2) | Infra operational issues backlog: https://github.com/orgs/NixOS/projects/52 | See #infra-alerts:nixos.org for real time alerts from Prometheus.149 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
29 Jun 2026
@flokli:matrix.orgflokli ah, summary, part of evaluation # 12:38:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI usually look at https://hydra.nixos.org/jobset/nixos/unstable12:38:56
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(the grey column are numbers of queued per eval)12:39:26
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátAlso note that status.nixos.org timestamps are for the moment of advancing, not for the stamp of the commit it advances to (which is my preferred view, with commit-date as a fairly good estimate of the definition which I'd prefer the most)12:41:32
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* Also note that status.nixos.org timestamps are for the moment of advancing, not for some stamp of the commit it advances to (which is my preferred view, with commit-date as a fairly good estimate of the definition which I'd prefer the most)12:41:46
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát e.g. nixos-unstable is on a 3 days old commit now, almost precisely. 12:42:40
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * e.g. nixos-unstable is on a 3 days old commit now, almost precisely.
(you can click the commit on status.nixos.org anyway)
12:43:41
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát * e.g. nixos-unstable is on a 3 days old commit now, almost precisely.
(you can click the commit on status.nixos.org anyway to see that)
12:43:48
@joerg:thalheim.ioMic92are we good now in that regard?12:59:06
@hexa:lossy.networkhexatoo early to say13:00:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexadowngrading sleepy-brown from mandatory to supported big-parallel19:19:41
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaat least then the machine won't idle19:19:47
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathe macs are regularly idle because they still show a high load for a minute after builds have ended19:49:43
@hexa:lossy.networkhexathat's stupid and we should look into that19:49:56
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír ČunátI thought the "load" is consistent across POSIX.19:50:30
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát(though for Linux we use PSI instead, I hope?)19:50:40
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát* (Though for Linux we use PSI instead, I hope?)19:50:45
@hexa:lossy.networkhexayes, psi on linux19:50:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexawhich is the much more useful metric19:50:52
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaand averages over 10s, not 60s19:50:59
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa10/60/30019:51:17
@vcunat:matrix.orgVladimír Čunát Perhaps it will work OK after some tuning. We used to have make's -l parameter. 19:51:38
@hexa:lossy.networkhexa we can only tune machineFreeFn on the queue-runner 19:52:29
30 Jun 2026
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianI found a corrupt gnugrep nar I think? https://cache.nixos.org/srk76h64a1ja4z7njh5lxcds7m9hnc7y.narinfo Says file size 248729 bytes But when i download i get 248412 bytes The FileHash also doesn't match Interestingly the NarHash does..00:23:31
@arianvp:matrix.orgArianOr at least the narinfo is corrupt00:25:51
@ihar.hrachyshka:matrix.orgIhar Hrachyshkalet me know if wrong channel... if a package (thunderbird-unwrapped) store path matches a successful build on hydra, is it reasonable to expect it to be available in cache? (I ask because for 26.05 it is not there, getting MISS on narinfo - which forces thunderbird build on update.) 02:02:42
@hexa:lossy.networkhexashould be, but I can see it is not02:21:46
@hexa:lossy.networkhexahttps://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixpkgs/nixpkgs-26.05-darwin/thunderbird-unwrapped.aarch64-darwin02:22:00
@hexa:lossy.networkhexamy best guess is that this is due to a bug in the new queue-runner, which was fairly new when that build happened 8 days ago02:22:40
@hexa:lossy.networkhexaI wonder more why 152.0 wasn't backported02:22:51

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6