| 29 Jun 2026 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Sigh, 3/4 build slots of hopeful-rivest are stuck after finishing the build (for 22h now). The build logs look like they finished successfully, but the result is not in cache.nixos.org | 08:29:56 |
Vladimír Čunát | I guess that's why the "running jobs" metric has been lower than usual in the past several hours. | 08:30:47 |
Vladimír Čunát | Now I deployed lockfile updates, which restarted the queue-runner, so this state should go away. | 08:50:43 |
Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | In reply to @dramforever:matrix.org re the still happening gc race, could this possibly be relevant? https://github.com/DeterminateSystems/nix-src/pull/482/changes/734a205d58a559a622ebc98256f4af4d968426b7 No, not really. The queue runner roots stuff itself and interacts with the daemon through harmonia | 09:11:48 |
Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | I think the last bits of FFI to nix are gone? | 09:12:05 |
Sergei Zimmerman (xokdvium) | In reply to @xokdvium:matrix.org No, not really. The queue runner roots stuff itself and interacts with the daemon through harmonia (And I know roughly nothing in that codebase) | 09:14:01 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Now I deployed lockfile updates, which restarted the queue-runner, so this state should go away. | 09:58:58 |
Vladimír Čunát | Yes, a few minutes ago again, a new ISO fail. The graphical ISOs seem to be quite a reliable test for this, as they have loads of dependencies and run for quite a few minutes (so likely hit the 1h GC interval). | 11:19:13 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Yes, a few minutes ago again, a new ISO fail. The graphical ISOs seem to be quite a reliable test for this, as they have loads of dependencies and run for quite a few minutes (so likely hit the hourly GC runs). | 11:19:25 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Yes, a few minutes ago again (step 97 here, a new ISO fail. The graphical ISOs seem to be quite a reliable test for this, as they have loads of dependencies and run for quite a few minutes (so likely hit the hourly GC runs). | 11:20:09 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Yes, a few minutes ago again (step 97 here), a new ISO fail. The graphical ISOs seem to be quite a reliable test for this, as they have loads of dependencies and run for quite a few minutes (so likely hit the hourly GC runs). | 11:20:18 |
hexa | we can gc less but harder on the linux fleet | 11:20:24 |
Vladimír Čunát | * Yes, a few minutes ago again, a new ISO fail (step 97 here). The graphical ISOs seem to be quite a reliable test for this, as they have loads of dependencies and run for quite a few minutes (so likely hit the hourly GC runs). | 11:20:36 |
hexa | I can also roll out fast-nix-gc there next | 11:20:59 |
Vladimír Čunát | Perhaps that directly. | 11:21:17 |
hexa | ok, ensure 30% free hourly | 11:21:43 |
hexa | and keep recent 72h | 11:21:47 |
hexa | we can tune that further as needed | 11:21:58 |
Vladimír Čunát | At a glance this switch doesn't seem risky in comparison to the current state. | 11:22:12 |
hexa | yeah, it isn't | 11:22:21 |
Vladimír Čunát | And it seems better in terms of moving the GC improvements forward. | 11:22:28 |
| @csanthiago:matrix.org joined the room. | 12:29:14 |
flokli | according to https://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/unstable/tested#tabs-status, the latest jobset did succeed 21m ago, but https://status.nixos.org/ still lists it as 2 days ago. did some of the channel bump scripts fail again? | 12:30:05 |
flokli | or did it not advance because it contains https://hydra.nixos.org/build/332754507 (Cancelled by user), which has a cached failure? | 12:31:23 |
hexa | 5207 remaining builds | 12:36:11 |
hexa | Redacted or Malformed Event | 12:36:18 |
flokli | so I'm reading the web interface wrong? | 12:36:44 |
leona | there are two criterias:
tested succeeded
- no more builds are queued in the eval
| 12:37:12 |
flokli | ok, where do I see what's still queued in the eval? :D | 12:38:04 |
hexa | https://hydra.nixos.org/eval/1826694 | 12:38:22 |