| 6 Apr 2025 |
 maralorn | The upstreaStackHpackVersion needs action. | 09:28:28 |
| maralorn | The others are not really blockers, imo. | 09:28:43 |
| maralorn | We should ping the maintainers again. | 09:28:54 |
| maralorn | Maybe there is still something important in the unfinished builds. | 09:31:21 |
| maralorn | alexfmpe: I get the feeling the cabal-add "fix" broke it on older ghcs. 😄 | 09:32:24 |
| maralorn | https://hydra.nixos.org/build/294449074/nixlog/91/tail | 09:32:37 |
| maralorn | sterni: Are you aware of anything major which needs to happen before we wrap the current PR? (Aside from the regular due diligence.) | 09:33:44 |
 sterni | yes needs to be conditional | 13:05:36 |
| sterni | I think lower GHC versions are pretty broken I think HLS needs to be redone for a couple of them essentially | 13:05:54 |
| sterni | I mean just look what's broken I haven't really checked since the new bump introduced a million regressions | 13:06:26 |
| maralorn | Yeah, no problem. Will do that. I was just wondering whether you have anything else cooking which is blocking a merge. | 13:07:46 |
| sterni | no I'm just cooking myself at the moment (cycling) | 13:37:58 |
| maralorn | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
no I'm just cooking myself at the moment (cycling) Excellent, you do that! | 13:38:54 |
 alexfmpe | oops | 15:02:30 |
| alexfmpe | the first two (coinor-clp, fft) built for me locally yesterday, might be flaky tests I dunno | 15:03:50 |
| alexfmpe | wouldn't bother with large-records, there's no release that works with 9.8 | 15:04:26 |
| alexfmpe | and it's pretty coupled to ghc internals, can't just jailbreak away | 15:04:37 |
| alexfmpe | mvc-updates has weird bounds on last two versions (1.2.0 uses older mvc than 1.1.2) but also looks unmaintained save for bumping bounds so meh | 15:05:49 |
| alexfmpe | jacinda had some weird test failure, no clue what that's about | 15:06:13 |
| alexfmpe | I think maralorn handled the other two | 15:06:29 |
| alexfmpe | as in, jailbreak probably works, but if it doesn't it probably requires upstream action | 15:08:17 |
 hellwolf | jacinda fails because one of the test case uses jacinda.cabal as its input, but I think it was modified by the build process. | 16:23:20 |
| hellwolf | * I had a quick look: jacinda fails because one of the test case uses jacinda.cabal as its input, but I think it was modified by the build process. | 16:23:27 |
| hellwolf | :p | 16:23:30 |
| hellwolf | # Additionally install documentation
jacinda = overrideCabal (drv: {
| 16:24:56 |
| alexfmpe | self referential madness | 16:42:18 |
| hellwolf | actually, I can't figure out exactly why, but it is most likely related to the test case reading the yacinda.cabal file itself as input. | 16:53:32 |
| hellwolf | * actually, I cannot figure out exactly why, but it is most likely related to the test case reading the yacinda.cabal file itself as input. Calling it a day... | 16:53:55 |
| 8 Apr 2025 |
| hellwolf | still in time to make 3.14.2.0 part of the haskell-updates before merging? | 12:40:17 |
| maralorn | We kinda shouldn’t. | 13:45:37 |
