| 30 Nov 2024 |
Patrick Steele | nix develop --command cabal test has the same issue as a naked cabal test; it tries to go to Hackage.
I'm still not sure why nix-shell --run 'cabal test' would not "build the project outside Nix"
| 21:33:37 |
Patrick Steele | I suppose I could literally just nix build .#thePackage and rely on Nix running the tests... | 21:34:55 |
alexfmpe | Well it builds the deps as nix derivations, and enters a nix-prepared shell environment | 22:12:30 |
alexfmpe | But then does a normal cabal build | 22:12:35 |
alexfmpe | In reply to @prsteele:matrix.org
nix develop --command cabal test has the same issue as a naked cabal test; it tries to go to Hackage.
I'm still not sure why nix-shell --run 'cabal test' would not "build the project outside Nix"
Disable hackage on cabal.project? | 22:13:00 |
| 1 Dec 2024 |
Patrick Steele | that seems like a better solution than what I had cobbled together, thanks | 01:56:25 |
| @aspendowntime:matrix.org changed their display name from Oktawia (it/they/she) to Nerissa (it/they/she). | 10:12:34 |
| @aspendowntime:matrix.org changed their display name from Nerissa (it/they/she) to Nerissa (it/she). | 18:51:11 |
| 3 Dec 2024 |
lazyLambda | In reply to @alexfmpe:matrix.org if one could have a TH pass or whatever typecheck the string literals, that'd be interesting https://github.com/augyg/ClasshSS this is it currently. Ergonomic-ness in progress and I need to make better documentation to begin with | 00:57:32 |
lazyLambda | In reply to @alexfmpe:matrix.org if one could have a TH pass or whatever typecheck the string literals, that'd be interesting * https://github.com/augyg/ClasshSS/tree/gs/modules this is it currently. Ergonomic-ness in progress and I need to make better documentation to begin with | 00:58:59 |
sterni (he/him) | gosh I really don't wanna do the GHA change for the merge workflow. doesn't seem like an enjoyable experiencing testing something by force pushing to a test repo | 20:18:20 |
sterni (he/him) | You would think they'd somehow add a way to sort of test actions offline at some point… | 20:19:03 |
maralorn | If we sync the timing of the jobs do we really knew to do the merge base thing? | 20:51:50 |
sterni (he/him) | yes. the merge from master to staging-next or from staging-next to staging might fail while the merge from master to haskell-updates succeeds | 21:32:18 |
maralorn | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org yes. the merge from master to staging-next or from staging-next to staging might fail while the merge from master to haskell-updates succeeds Yeah, that's what I thought. | 22:35:42 |
maralorn | * | 22:35:51 |
| 4 Dec 2024 |
| turkishcomrade joined the room. | 05:28:50 |
| 5 Dec 2024 |
| hamyn joined the room. | 15:27:08 |
| 8 Dec 2024 |
| @iampyu:matrix.org joined the room. | 20:33:21 |
| @iampyu:matrix.org set a profile picture. | 20:38:56 |
| 9 Dec 2024 |
maralorn | @sternenseemann:systemli.org Oh, damn. Stackage bump to 9.8 is incoming. | 09:32:52 |
maralorn | Possibly already today. | 09:33:31 |
alexfmpe | finally | 10:33:16 |
sterni (he/him) | maralorn: I was thinking we should switch in the next iteration anyways | 12:43:31 |
sterni (he/him) | although I'm wondering if it's worth bumping one more time on the current LTS directly | 12:43:43 |
maralorn | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org maralorn: I was thinking we should switch in the next iteration anyways Huh, why? | 12:44:06 |
sterni (he/him) | queue is under 100k builds maybe we can reenable the jobset again soon :| | 12:44:10 |
maralorn | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org although I'm wondering if it's worth bumping one more time on the current LTS directly Yeah, thought so too. | 12:44:15 |
sterni (he/him) | I mean we were talking about switching to nightly anyways? | 12:44:23 |
maralorn | Yeah, true. | 12:44:42 |