!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

702 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure139 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
19 Aug 2025
@xvwx:matrix.dapp.org.uk@xvwx:matrix.dapp.org.uk left the room.14:23:55
@artem.types:matrix.orgArtem

what is the better commit message / PR title for a nixpkgs PR:

haskellPackages.{liquidhaskell, liqquidhaskell-boot, liquid-fixpoint, smtlib-backends-process, smtlib-backends-tests}: unbreak

or

haskellPackages.liquidhaskell and dependencies: unbreak

14:28:57
@artem.types:matrix.orgArtem *

what is the better commit message / PR title for a nixpkgs PR:

haskellPackages.{liquidhaskell, liqquidhaskell-boot, liquid-fixpoint, smtlib-backends-process, smtlib-backends-tests}: unbreak

or

haskellPackages.liquidhaskell and dependencies: unbreak

?

14:29:02
@symphorien:xlumurb.eusymphorienthe ci parses commit messages, so if you do one commit per package it will build the right packages14:34:20
@artem.types:matrix.orgArtemouch, I did one commit for everything! just to double-check: is one commit per package a requirement?14:40:19

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6