!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

703 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure139 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
30 Sep 2025
@teoc:matrix.orgteo (they/he)The Haskell libs come from relative paths and that apparently complicates the patchelf stuff somehow16:13:43
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV HLS. Just let cabal solve it, maybe use something like francescos thing 16:14:06
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV Basically excempt the annoying things from the package set and just let cabal solve for them and install the static binary 16:15:41
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV Then you build one per GHC and that’s it. 16:15:57
@teoc:matrix.orgteo (they/he)Isn't there a thing about how GHC/HLS can't be statically linked16:16:20
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV Oh I mean Haskell static linking? 16:16:37
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV Fwiw it’s not important. I basically just mean, cut off the binary so the closure isn’t huge 16:17:27
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornYeah, no. Not possible if you want to support TH.16:17:51

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6