| 30 Sep 2025 |
 MangoIV | (Fwiw same applies for GHC bindist) | 16:09:50 |
| MangoIV | A FOD would be good | 16:10:04 |
 maralorn | I mean, we somehow use ghc bindists in nixpkgs, right?^^ | 16:10:38 |
| maralorn | I don’t even know what our derivations for that do differently from ghcup. 😄 | 16:10:55 |
| maralorn | A fod of what? | 16:11:12 |
 Teo (he/him) | I was just reading the binary GHC bindist code. There's a bit of complexity there, but it's mostly just using patchelf to provide the C deps | 16:12:36 |
| Teo (he/him) | The Haskell libs come from relative paths and that apparently complicates the patchelf stuff somehow | 16:13:43 |
