!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

695 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure138 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
15 Sep 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyI assumed you'd need a lot more glue. cool13:40:52
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIVbut it would for sure require support of cabal upstream, right? I don't think that that's a good idea at all tbh. 13:41:25
@teoc:matrix.orgteo (they/he) This didn't actually achieve it but we had this MR ages ago: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/5965 13:42:24
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily I would personally only expose a fully bootstrapped one as first-class but it's not my decision to make. probably having a withHugsBootstrap param on the MicroHs derivation and microhs takes microhs as a build input that you override to have withHugsBootstrap or something 13:42:33
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIVAlso why does hadrian not support proper incremental build support? 13:42:37

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6