| 2 Sep 2025 |
|  Wolfgang Walther joined the room. | 12:10:07 |
 sterni (he/him) | bglgwyng: what does patched mean here? | 12:11:25 |
| sterni (he/him) | Wolfgang Walther: hi :) | 12:11:38 |
 bglgwyng | I did glib = callCabal2Nix ./glib-x.y.z {...} thing. I'm using haskell-flake so the code is different but the result would be so. | 12:14:43 |
| sterni (he/him) | i guess you should first rule out that you have multiple gtk2hs-buildtools derivations in the build environment | 12:24:38 |
|  @aidalgol:tchncs.de joined the room. | 21:56:50 |
| 3 Sep 2025 |
|  ghpzin joined the room. | 09:31:07 |
|  Gerd Flaig joined the room. | 20:55:18 |
| 4 Sep 2025 |
|  epimonic joined the room. | 00:36:54 |
| @aidalgol:tchncs.de changed their display name from Aidan Gauland to aidalgol[m]. | 11:23:25 |
| @aidalgol:tchncs.de changed their display name from aidalgol[m] to aidalgol. | 11:24:11 |
 maralorn | Ah, yeah, users and their wishes. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/190542#issuecomment-3253170725
Funny thing is I remember vividly how hard not having the newest version of anything would have annoyed me ten years ago. 😄 | 11:52:17 |
 Uraraka ~ Ochaco | Absolutely a thing we would need so far to continue | 12:25:17 |
 emily | ok, how are you meant to go from an LLVM commit hash to the merge request that contains it? | 13:52:57 |
| emily | the GitLab UI completely fails to show the link since they use a merge bot | 13:53:07 |
 Alyssa Ross | LLVM? They use GitHub | 13:54:33 |
| emily | whoops. sorry. GHC. | 14:05:13 |
| emily | you see, I am working with LLVM-related GHC patches :P | 14:05:28 |
 Teo (he/him) | Do you have the commit? | 14:08:55 |
| Teo (he/him) | * Could you share the commit SHA? | 14:09:10 |
| Teo (he/him) | If you open the commit, you'll normally see back links at the bottom of the page from marge bot mentions | 14:10:19 |
|  angerman set a profile picture. | 21:15:40 |
|  Puna joined the room. | 21:21:56 |
| 5 Sep 2025 |
 John Ericson | If anyone wants to help me debug https://github.com/haskell-nix/hnix-store/pull/289 that would be great. Just wishing aloud in case I'm lucky | 01:30:55 |
| * John Ericson sleeps now | 01:31:03 |
|  @dmjio:matrix.org left the room. | 02:09:38 |
| maralorn | Aaah, what is the point of having ghc-lib-parser spanning three ghc versions when fourmolu and ormolu track cabal-syntax anyway which is tightly coupled to the ghc release … | 12:16:17 |
| maralorn | I have now the choice of downgrading ghc-lib-parser, fourmolu and ormolu to build hls on ghc 9.10 or to upgrade Cabal/Cabal-syntax. Both either globally or in a quite large overrideScope. | 12:17:35 |
| maralorn | I feel like I am overlooking something because that didn’t feel as painful before … | 12:18:04 |
 Artem | maralorn: the very strict bounds that Ormolu puts on Cabal-syntax look strange. I'd ask on their bug tracker exactly the question you're posing above: if you use ghc-lib-parser, you probably want to span over at least couple of GHC, but you also always limit Cabal-syntax to one version, so this looks like mixed messages... They always bump Cabal-syntax when they bump ghc-lib-parser, so they at least understand some connection they just overly pessimistic about it it looks like. | 15:10:21 |
