Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS | 697 Members | |
| For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | 139 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Jun 2025 | ||
| 20:33:06 | |
| Makes me smile everytime I read it. 😄 | 20:33:15 | |
| can we, like, shame upstream into doing something different? | 20:54:44 | |
| hm did wolfgang talk to anyone before the warnIf change? | 21:28:42 | |
| the PR is pretty much what I wanted to do myself, but it's a pretty self merge in any case | 21:29:05 | |
| maybe he has telepathic abilities :) | 21:29:13 | |
| I know of nothing. 😄 | 21:41:40 | |
| Sooo … what would an empty queue roughly look like? I guess 50k builds waiting for staging-next is not it? 😄 | 22:44:26 | |
| that's a question | 22:45:17 | |
| I mean we can probably eval, we share most GHCs with staging-next | 22:45:35 | |
| if it's a problem someone can always cancel an eval | 22:45:43 | |
| 4 Jun 2025 | ||
| 00:33:34 | ||
| 09:47:39 | ||
| shenanigans… https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stackage/issues/7768 | 12:07:20 | |
| over https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/413885 | 12:19:57 | |
| sterni: Would you prefer all haskell-updates PRs to have that prefix? | 12:21:03 | |
| it doesn't really matter, I think it is more useful for other reviewers to immediately see that they can ignore it | 12:21:42 | |
| though I think other commiters just ignore Haskell PRs based on the label as a general rule, so probably doesn't matter | 12:22:01 | |
| you don't need it for searching since base:haskell-updates works for that | 12:22:16 | |
| Alex: https://hydra.nixos.org/build/299142554/nixlog/48 this is the race condition | 12:35:29 | |
| shall we merge my aarch64-android-prebuilt and ucrt64 PRs this cycle? I rather not do more rounds of fixing nix-fmt conflicts https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/355543 https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/357744 | 17:46:33 | |
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org Seems simple enough to work around. PR soon. (Do you know if upstream is interested in a fix for such an old version?) | 18:53:09 | |
In reply to @alexfmpe:matrix.orgI merged the one I had already approved. I haven't even heard of ucrt before. 😂 | 19:07:59 | |
| the good and/or bad news is that neither did I before I started working on it | 19:11:21 | |
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org I think it never happens for the native builds because unlike cross they are full builds including HTML documentation and other stuff. I'm inclined to make the fix not conditional on being cross. | 19:37:52 | |
| you can also make it unconditional and PR it to staging | 19:44:11 | |
| 20:10:06 | ||
| Did I get lucky on my first attempt to reproduce it after fixing?
(Notice the lack of install commands for | 20:40:14 | |
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.orghttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/414063 | 21:42:26 | |
| 7 Jun 2025 | ||
| 23:04:40 | ||