!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

704 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/142 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
18 Apr 2025
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily(but also just that the freeze schedule is designed around the normal procedures where everything is being batched together)16:36:10
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily anyway, freeze exceptions are not uncommon so it shouldn't be a big issue, but it's not sounding to me like there are remaining issues of the kind that would prevent a merge into staging 16:36:53
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornAnyway the way I read the release schedule it says "2025-05-08 unrestrict all breaking changes on staging" for me the natural conclusion is: Everything that hits staging before -05-08 will reach the release.16:41:08
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornYou are. And you are free to fix or maintain any package you want. However your vibes are not actionable for anyone else and if you insist on that mode you are the only one who can approve a merge. So I will do you the favor of ignoring that. Feel free to announce any package you want to have working before the merge at any time though.16:45:20
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyright but we do ideally try to have a cycle without breaking changes16:50:19
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysince even fixes/minor bumps can cause enough headaches16:50:33
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily though of course that can happen after branch-off, but we don't always get as many -next cycles as we'd like 16:50:53
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilysometimes all the last-minute breaking changes pile into one cycle and then we need another one to clean up remaining carnage :P16:51:14
@emilazy:matrix.orgemilyanyway, since the Haskell stuff has received so much testing I don't anticipate great issues. (but AIUI the cases where Haskell stuff interacts with the rest of the system don't get as much testing, so I do think landing soon would be good)16:51:49
@emilazy:matrix.orgemily (like, maybe a major ShellCheck or Pandoc bump might break stuff. I don't know if those are in the pipeline, just an example of a fire we might have to put out during a -next cycle) 16:52:15
@petrockette:matrix.orgpetrockette changed their profile picture.17:38:09
19 Apr 2025
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni maralorn: looks like HLS/hlint are the last big things from the report. Musl/Static stuff can be ignored and needs to be reevaluated in staging(-next). thielema package failures look weird, maybe worth a bug report upstream. large-records is not fixable for the moment. 09:57:18

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6