| 9 Jan 2025 |
 alexfmpe | I need to remove at least half a dozen overrides on configuration-ghc910.nix to fix eval
(also not sure why these are triggered by ghc912 packages, maybe some side effect of building 9.12 with 9.10) | 19:09:24 |
| alexfmpe | * I need to remove at least half a dozen (no longer valid due to stackage containing latest version) overrides on configuration-ghc910.nix to fix eval
(also not sure why these are triggered by ghc912 packages, maybe some side effect of building 9.12 with 9.10) | 19:09:54 |
| alexfmpe | * I need to remove at least half a dozen (no longer valid due to LTS 23 containing latest version) overrides on configuration-ghc910.nix to fix eval
(also not sure why these are triggered by ghc912 packages, maybe some side effect of building 9.12 with 9.10) | 19:10:02 |
|  @feichtmeier:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 19:49:56 |
| @feichtmeier:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 20:03:27 |
| @feichtmeier:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 20:04:22 |
| @feichtmeier:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 20:04:50 |
| @feichtmeier:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 20:07:23 |
| @feichtmeier:matrix.org left the room. | 20:49:10 |
| 10 Jan 2025 |
 sterni | alexfmpe: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/372229 for 9.10 (yes 9.12 ist built using 9.10) | 09:28:59 |
| sterni | as to the merge conflicts, they are not real. haskell-updates is practically fast forward compared to staging, but it doesn’t contain the merge commit haskell-updates -> staging so git can’t infer that there’s no problem in practice | 09:30:22 |
| sterni | the conflicts should all be solvable by the automatic strategy when we merge | 09:30:50 |
| sterni | or go away when staging-next including the last merge commit propagate to master an back to our branch | 09:31:29 |
| sterni | I still need to document the new setup which would explain it | 09:31:42 |
| sterni | but haven’t managed to solve alls issues with it yet :( | 09:32:06 |
| alexfmpe | Ok so I won't make your life harder if I PR to that PR with changes to configjration-foo files? | 12:02:26 |
| alexfmpe | * Ok so I won't make your life harder if I PR to that PR with changes to configuration-foo files? | 12:02:36 |
| alexfmpe | Or rather | 12:03:10 |
| alexfmpe | By branching off your remove-attributed, then targeting haskell-updates with other changes to configuration-foo | 12:03:50 |
| sterni | if you pick my commit and pr stuff with that included we can just merge that yeah | 14:29:59 |
| alexfmpe | okok | 16:06:35 |
| alexfmpe | on another note, should we merge my fixes for aarch64-android-prebuilt and ucrt ? | 16:06:52 |
| alexfmpe | or do you want them to update release-cross.nix ? | 16:07:43 |
| alexfmpe | (I'll need to rebuild on top of LTS 23 branch anyway) | 16:07:52 |
| alexfmpe | * (I'll need to rebuild on top of LTS 23 branch anyway to make sure they still increase buildability) | 16:08:08 |
| alexfmpe | * on another note, should we merge my fixes for aarch64-android-prebuilt and ucrt as-is? | 16:08:37 |
| alexfmpe | * or should release-cross.nix be updated as well? | 16:08:51 |
| alexfmpe | * (I'll need to rebase on top of LTS 23 branch anyway to make sure they still increase buildability) | 16:10:26 |
|  SigmaSquadron changed their display name from SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-12) to SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-11). | 22:15:57 |
| SigmaSquadron changed their display name from SigmaSquadron (Away until 2024-01-11) to SigmaSquadron (Away until 2025-01-11). | 22:43:35 |
