| 14 Mar 2026 |
 alexfmpe | you might be building some transitive deps, or deps of tooling (e.g. cabal-install, cabal2nix) | 00:03:01 |
 ijouw | It started building basement foundation and happy (it likely was compiling cabal and hoogle ) | 00:03:21 |
| alexfmpe | I think there's less caching for darwin, only happens on master and release branches or something | 00:03:39 |
| alexfmpe | historically I've seen my m1 get less caching of haskell-updates than my linux | 00:04:03 |
| ijouw | I am running nixos | 00:04:32 |
| alexfmpe | same | 00:04:50 |
| alexfmpe | try the above rev | 00:04:54 |
| alexfmpe | and the same --dry-run | 00:05:03 |
| ijouw | Oh, i was stil using ghcHEAD... | 00:07:09 |
| ijouw | git pull is taking a while | 00:17:57 |
| ijouw | Will sleep first. Thank you for the help and good night. | 00:37:40 |
| ijouw | It worked, thanks. | 14:52:34 |
| ijouw | Having it integrate with developPackage seems complicated. Will try shell env only. | 15:30:26 |
|  amadaluzia -> 4d2.org changed their display name from amadaluzia to amadaluzia[uorg]. | 18:48:52 |
|  amadaluzia joined the room. | 19:24:31 |
| amadaluzia -> 4d2.org changed their display name from amadaluzia[uorg] to amadaluzia -> 4d2.org. | 21:22:30 |
| 15 Mar 2026 |
|  eveeifyeve joined the room. | 13:40:03 |
| eveeifyeve | Does anyone know what is blocking this pr: https://github.com/NixOS/cabal2nix/pull/667? Because I would like to get a move along so I can close the opentracing tracking issue. | 13:41:02 |
| eveeifyeve | * sterni: what is blocking this pr: https://github.com/NixOS/cabal2nix/pull/667? Because I would like to get a move along so I can close the opentracing tracking issue. | 13:41:18 |
 sterni (he/him) | I think wolfgang doesn't have the time for it at the moment, but I'm not sure. | 13:42:04 |
| sterni (he/him) | the thing is also that the Haskell opentracing implementation seems to be maintained still (had a release last year) and does not actually depend on any of the upstream opentracing packages. | 13:43:49 |
| sterni (he/him) | so it does not seem to me like it needs to be removed | 13:44:01 |
| eveeifyeve | But the protocol has been deprecated/archived, so it will not work. | 13:48:57 |
| eveeifyeve | * But the protocol has been deprecated/archived for open telemetry, so it will not work. | 13:49:40 |
| eveeifyeve | See https://github.com/opentracing/specification/issues/163 | 13:50:33 |
| eveeifyeve | * See https://github.com/opentracing/specification/issues/163 for more info | 13:50:38 |
| sterni (he/him) | well i mean if you still have an opentracing compatible server and client it will continue to work the same as it used to | 13:55:51 |
| eveeifyeve | Lightstep has been deprecated/archived so that can be removed. I have also opened up an issue upstream: https://github.com/kim/opentracing/issues/55 | 13:56:28 |
| sterni (he/him) | i agree it doesn't make sense to keep maintaining this stuff, but it's also not like anything bad is going to happen if it's still around | 13:56:45 |
| eveeifyeve | But again in nixpkgs, we should not keep stuff that seems like it will go unmaintained in nixpkgs. | 14:06:02 |
