!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

702 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure139 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
21 Mar 2026
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni alexfmpe: Alex: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/501983 so this is my idea, just letting cc wrapper deal with stage0 (since we're in stdenv anyways) 16:30:59
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsternigonna clean that up, patch doesn't seem too terrible to maintain, may even be upstreamable in some shape or form16:31:27
@teoc:matrix.orgteo (they/he)

I'm not sure if there's an existing issue. Creating one sounds great! https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/15231 might cover this but I'm not sure.

Even if it's just nix specific it would be good to have it upstream since then we'd be less likely to break downstream all the time.

16:53:41
24 Mar 2026
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpedo we have any idea what causes the rts configure error mentioned in https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/482251#issuecomment-377941325218:25:28
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpeI also hit it for s390x18:25:33
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpe* affects some powerpc variants, i686, s390x18:25:59
@libjared:matrix.org@libjared:matrix.org left the room.21:26:45

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6