| 19 Apr 2025 |
 alexfmpe | hostPlatform.config = "x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu"
package.meta.platforms = [
"javascript-ghcjs"
]
package.meta.badPlatforms = [ ]
| 16:21:58 |
| alexfmpe | shouldn't it, like, not try to eval? | 16:22:30 |
 maralorn | Well the problem is that it has a dependency which doesn't eval. | 16:26:10 |
| maralorn | So the correct solution seems to be to restrict the plattforms of miso-action-logger if that's factually correct. | 16:27:09 |
| alexfmpe | but they are? | 16:27:32 |
| alexfmpe | the error message says so | 16:27:43 |
| alexfmpe | building locally I also get
a) To temporarily allow packages that are unsupported for this system, you can use an environment variable
for a single invocation of the nix tools.
$ export NIXPKGS_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM=1
| 16:28:04 |
| maralorn | In reply to @alexfmpe:matrix.org
but they are? No, the error message is showing a part of the ghcjs-base derivation. The miso-action-logger derivation has no restrictions. | 16:31:32 |
| alexfmpe | oooh | 16:31:44 |
| maralorn | I wonder if we have to null ghcjs-base or something... | 16:32:22 |
| alexfmpe | I'll try a few things | 16:32:50 |
| alexfmpe | IIRC miso itself didn't build for native in nixpkgs until recently, because cabal would find no libraries or anything after going through the conditionals | 16:33:33 |
| alexfmpe | it just built for me now though, technically was cached | 16:33:53 |
| alexfmpe | think that was changed by the 1.8.7 release | 16:34:13 |
| alexfmpe | not enough because the package always unconditionally declares the dependency and imports from it | 16:37:43 |
| alexfmpe | https://github.com/Lermex/miso-action-logger/issues/1 | 16:38:02 |
| alexfmpe | I'll just flag as ghcjs only | 16:38:08 |
| alexfmpe | someone put up a PR for this on large-records just 2 hours ago, but still needs sanity check so I'm not leaning towards even applying as patch until it's reviewed
I don't think we should block merge to staging on it, can just be PR'd directly to staging if upstream rubber stamps without an immediate release? | 16:45:09 |
| alexfmpe |
https://github.com/well-typed/large-records/pull/171 | 16:45:16 |
| alexfmpe | https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/400121 | 16:54:25 |
| alexfmpe | hey we broke 400k | 16:54:29 |
 sterni (he/him) | agree & agree & agree | 18:40:27 |
| alexfmpe changed their profile picture. | 23:55:28 |
| 20 Apr 2025 |
| maralorn | In reply to @emilazy:matrix.org
the 23rd is the nominal breaking change deadline and I assume there are breaking changes here If no one else does, I will finalize our merge on Tuesday. | 23:03:04 |
| 21 Apr 2025 |
|  @megmug:matrix.org left the room. | 11:25:41 |
| 22 Apr 2025 |
| sterni (he/him) | I'm currently finishing the broken list and am going to merge after that. | 08:52:40 |
| sterni (he/him) | Any further fixes can probably relatively easily be done on staging(-next) | 08:52:56 |
| sterni (he/him) | * I'm currently finishing the broken list and am going to merge after that. Going to take a minute since I manually need to check the queued jobs. | 08:53:20 |
 hellwolf | hurray!
I would invite everyone to have a second look at the diff of 1909d9a. We can still fix packages that are worth fixing on staging (within reason, i.e. another hackage bump on there is rather difficult).
pkgs/development/haskell-modules/configuration-hackage2nix/broken.yaml: "+450-19"
Am I reading right that there are 400+ more borken packages because of the 9.8?
| 10:15:10 |
| hellwolf | https://github.com/cdepillabout/nix-haskell-updates-status
"Top 50 broken packages, sorted by number of reverse dependencies"
Is this the place to start to look for the culprits? | 10:17:02 |
