Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS | 743 Members | |
| For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | 148 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 20 Oct 2025 | ||
In reply to @raboof:matrix.orgyes | 07:00:18 | |
In reply to @raboof:matrix.org* did you measure performance impact? | 07:00:28 | |
In reply to @raboof:matrix.org* yes, dynamically linking executables means excessively large closure sizes | 07:01:25 | |
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.orgAs usual, separate outputs would be nice but potentially require a lot of effort to implement. :s | 08:17:03 | |
| 21 Oct 2025 | ||
| 04:51:49 | ||
| 10:36:16 | ||
| is cabal2nix not aware of build-tools-depends or do i need to blame flake-parts's haskell-flake? | 21:57:25 | |
| eldritchcookie: the latter I think | 23:13:21 | |
| * eldritchcookie: the former I think | 23:13:25 | |
| * eldritchcookie: the former I think (not aware) | 23:13:33 | |
| i did some digging and actually calling cabal2nix on my cabal package has an output which contains TestToolDepends = [tasty-discover]; so somebody is dropping that and it certainly isnt cabal2nix | 23:17:22 | |
| 22 Oct 2025 | ||
| for 'these' it does seem slower, but in the order of 'tens of milliseconds' on an ~11-second build. I tried a more substantial package (hoogle), that was about 2 seconds slower for a 46-second build (averages across 4 builds each). So measurable impact (but promising to see it did seem to have the desired effect for hoogle as well)... | 10:39:44 | |
| hm, im getting this from nixpkgs:
weird | 20:24:03 | |
| its an interesting failure, very, not helpful | 20:24:57 | |