| 13 Aug 2025 |
 Artem | if I unbreak certain Haskell package (e.g. by adding jailbreaks and alike in configuration-common.nix), do I remove broken=false; from hackage-packages.nix in the same commit that I want to submit as a PR? | 18:28:55 |
| Artem | ah, I guess I update configuration-hackage2nix/broken.yaml, sorry | 18:33:08 |
| Artem | oh, no, I do :-) | 18:37:24 |
| Artem | Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:03:51 |
| Artem | does Haskell builder understand build-tool-depends in cabal files? I'm seeing a test component that has BTD on an executable in the same package and it can't find it at run time | 19:09:09 |
| Artem | * Does Haskell builder understand build-tool-depends in cabal files? I'm seeing a test component that has BTD on an executable in the same package and it can't find it at run time | 19:21:04 |
| Artem | That's the liquid-fixpoint package, its "test" test suite appears to call to the "fixpoint" executable from the same package but nix-build arrives at:
...
Running phase: checkPhase
Running 2 test suites...
Test suite test: RUNNING...
/bin/sh: fixpoint: not found
| 19:21:05 |
 sterni | Artem: you need to add the build directory to PATH before execution since Cabal won't do it for you unfortunately | 19:58:37 |
| sterni | there should probably be a shorthand for it, but you can just grep configuration-nix.nix for PATH to see how to do it | 19:58:59 |
| sterni | emily: Alyssa Ross: See https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell-derivation-deps for input specificication in haskellPackages. Everything is eventually mapped to buildInputs, propagatedBuildInputs and nativeBuildInputs. Using checkInputs and friends is not necessary since that is basically a shorthand for adding lib.optionals doCheck [ … ] to buildInputs/nativeBuildInputs and we have to conditionalize loads on doCheck anyways. | 20:02:03 |
| sterni | in the nix build? | 20:04:55 |
| Artem | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
in the nix build? Yes | 20:23:05 |
