| 26 Jul 2025 |
 Alex | True, maybe time to try asking around again. | 21:34:49 |
 aidalgol | sterni: I figure we should probably take the oama cabal discussion here. Should I just leave it pinned to the old GHC version, or try overriding it with a newer Cabal version, or something else? | 21:55:01 |
| aidalgol | Full disclosure, I am not familiar with Haskell tooling, and only maintain oama in nixpkgs because I have a strong need for a working OAUTH credential manager that can use the Secrets Service interface. | 21:56:19 |
| 27 Jul 2025 |
 teo (they/he) | In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
we should cross compile some bindists before it stops being possible :p Btw if there's issues the nixpkgs maintainers would like emphasized more, I'm happy to raise things at the GHC meetings. No guarantees that stuff will get prioritised but it might help avoid stuff falling through the cracks | 12:41:23 |
| Alex | In reply to @teoc:matrix.org
Btw if there's issues the nixpkgs maintainers would like emphasized more, I'm happy to raise things at the GHC meetings. No guarantees that stuff will get prioritised but it might help avoid stuff falling through the cracks Do you know if anyone is looking into making cross work with Hadrian?
It would probably be far more effort than adding our own bindists to tarballs.nixos.org and is of limited benefit to x86 and aarch64, so I could understand if nobody wants to do it. | 15:54:29 |
| teo (they/he) | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
Do you know if anyone is looking into making cross work with Hadrian?
It would probably be far more effort than adding our own bindists to tarballs.nixos.org and is of limited benefit to x86 and aarch64, so I could understand if nobody wants to do it. Maybe this https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/11444 ? | 16:08:09 |
| teo (they/he) | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
Do you know if anyone is looking into making cross work with Hadrian?
It would probably be far more effort than adding our own bindists to tarballs.nixos.org and is of limited benefit to x86 and aarch64, so I could understand if nobody wants to do it. * Maybe this https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/11444 ? | 16:10:12 |
| teo (they/he) | In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyz
Do you know if anyone is looking into making cross work with Hadrian?
It would probably be far more effort than adding our own bindists to tarballs.nixos.org and is of limited benefit to x86 and aarch64, so I could understand if nobody wants to do it. * Maybe this https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/11444 ?
Is there a specific set of issues you have in mind?
| 16:13:07 |
|  @pkmean:matrix.org joined the room. | 17:05:13 |
| @pkmean:matrix.org left the room. | 17:15:15 |
|  foxmean joined the room. | 17:24:22 |
| Alex | In reply to @teoc:matrix.org
Maybe this https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/merge_requests/11444 ?
Is there a specific set of issues you have in mind?
That sounds like precisely it, yes.
Maybe if I get the time I'll try applying the MR in Nixpkgs... | 17:34:35 |
| teo (they/he) | There's also been a lot of work recently on making more boot libs easy to reinstall and on ghc-toolchain. Both of those should make everything cross related easier to implement in a nice way | 18:04:53 |
