| 19 Dec 2025 |
sterni (he/him) | ofc 9.14.1 releases when i leave the house without my laptop | 15:23:59 |
| 21 Dec 2025 |
| Mr Mayhem changed their display name from Magnolia Mayhem to Mr Mayhem. | 20:57:53 |
| 22 Dec 2025 |
| @cinerealkiara:matrix.org left the room. | 13:12:27 |
| amadaluzia[tde] changed their display name from ➡️@amadaluzia:unredacted.org to amadALTuzia (tchncs.de). | 16:11:31 |
| amadaluzia[tde] changed their display name from amadALTuzia (tchncs.de) to amadaluzia[tde]. | 17:30:15 |
magic_rb | how can i pass -Werror only in a Nix build? dont see a ghcFlags | 21:54:45 |
magic_rb | and buildFlags doesn't work | 21:54:58 |
maralorn | magic_rb: example here: https://github.com/maralorn/nix-output-monitor/blob/9a32f32f807a4f7bc97d95606465243f293650fe/flake.nix#L50 | 22:08:31 |
magic_rb | Thanks, i didnt think of passing it through cabal :D | 22:18:15 |
maralorn | I have no clue if this is the smartes solution. | 22:19:27 |
magic_rb | Hey if it works it works | 22:24:37 |
magic_rb | It definitely wont be the dumbest/worst piece of the nix in the repo i want to put it in. I wrote that repos initial version years ago and boy was i an idiot | 22:25:22 |
| 23 Dec 2025 |
chreekat | Fun cabal fact: there's also a --ghc-options flag (with an s). Lets you put multiple, space separated ghc options in one go | 04:59:59 |
magic_rb | the deps for microlens-mtl_0_2_1_1 are wrong, it pulls in microlens but it needs microlens_0_5_0_0 | 11:27:22 |
Alex | In reply to @magic_rb:matrix.redalder.org the deps for microlens-mtl_0_2_1_1 are wrong, it pulls in microlens but it needs microlens_0_5_0_0 Nixpkgs does not do dependency solving.
Try overriding the haskell package set (see the Haskell section of the Nixpkgs manual). | 15:33:07 |
magic_rb | Yeah i just overrode it manually for the deps, just kinda weird | 15:34:40 |
magic_rb | The versioned packages exist, but they dont depend on yeah other | 15:35:03 |
chreekat | I believe that all the versioned packages are just there because they can be with no guarantees | 17:06:45 |
chreekat | * | 17:06:57 |
magic_rb | Fair fair, thought it was an oversight :) | 17:35:00 |
| 26 Dec 2025 |
Magnus | Did `ghc9103` get dropped from 25.11?
Only the native-bignum variant is present still. | 16:03:58 |
Magnus | Somehow `ghc910` is listed as version 9.10.3 still though. | 16:11:13 |
emily | isn't that because GMP or whatever was removed upstream? | 16:11:14 |
emily | ah, no, that was integer-simple | 16:11:52 |
emily | 9.10.3 looks there to me https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/nixos-25.11/pkgs/top-level/haskell-packages.nix | 16:12:02 |
Magnus | I don't see it at https://search.nixos.org/packages?channel=25.11&query=ghc910 | 16:16:51 |
emily | it's just being deduplicated with haskell.compiler.ghc910 pretty sure. search is weird. | 16:18:03 |
emily | the minor version attributes aren't very supported AIUI | 16:18:10 |
emily | er, the patch version ones that is | 16:18:14 |
emily | you should say ghc910 rather than ghc9103 | 16:18:22 |