!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

695 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure138 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
7 Feb 2026
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni Alex: https://gitlab.haskell.org/ghc/ghc/-/blob/ghc-9.4/m4/fp_settings.m4 11:47:43
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex Oh nice, so CONF_CC_OPTS_STAGE2 (or whatever it is derived from) might work. 11:48:46
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlexYep, that fixed it. PR soon.12:56:30
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex sterni https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/487958
(Thanks for pinging me about this by the way.)
13:06:06
@andromeda:tchncs.deandromedaI needed 9.12.1 for a language feature, now have to rebuild all my dependencies again :(19:18:11
@andromeda:tchncs.deandromedamy life is so hard /s19:18:18
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpe is haskell.packages.ghc912.foobarpackage not cached in hydra? 19:40:59
@andromeda:tchncs.deandromedait rebuilt linear, opengl, glfw-b, and most/all of their dependencies, so I guess not19:44:29
@andromeda:tchncs.deandromeda new favourite language extension MultilineStrings 19:48:36
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpe
$ nix-build -A haskell.packages.ghc912.haskell-language-server --dry-run 2>&1 | grep "will be"
these 472 paths will be fetched (354.11 MiB download, 4469.75 MiB unpacked):
19:49:52
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpeseems cached for x86_64-linux at least19:49:59
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpe
$ nix-build -A haskell.packages.ghc912.linear --dry-run 2>&1 | head -n 10
these 2 derivations will be built:
  /nix/store/k43nhxkm1wssqw6dcypgq911bjskchfd-bytes-0.17.5.drv
  /nix/store/49f28h8fg1bbf8mdgf2wpnv84r2jhp1y-linear-1.23.3.drv
these 81 paths will be fetched (31.83 MiB download, 402.85 MiB unpacked):
19:51:52
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpemaybe you happened to build something recently merged so hydra hadn't catched up yet19:52:28
@andromeda:tchncs.deandromeda🤷‍♀️19:53:49
@alex:tunstall.xyzAlex It's inconsistent because haskell-updates gets all non-broken packages for its default GHC cached, but sometimes master (and thus nixpkgs-unstable) deviates slightly from it. 20:15:47
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpe ah fair, I was checking in haskell-updates 20:17:53
@alexfmpe:matrix.orgalexfmpe

seems pretty much the same in current master:

$ nix-build -A haskell.packages.ghc912.haskell-language-server --dry-run 2>&1 | grep "will be"
these 507 paths will be fetched (357.33 MiB download, 4501.69 MiB unpacked):

$ nix-build -A haskell.packages.ghc912.linear --dry-run 2>&1 | head -n 4
these 2 derivations will be built:
  /nix/store/57bmq5jy0sraqqava0jr0swivma0xd0q-bytes-0.17.4.drv
  /nix/store/pbghk5rsl6s077p32m655yvn8c8fc246-linear-1.23.2.drv
these 100 paths will be fetched (36.87 MiB download, 465.34 MiB unpacked):
20:18:59
8 Feb 2026
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniwe've removed 9.12.1, so must be an old revision11:52:55
@b:chreekat.netchreekat

If I try to override Cabal and Cabal-syntax in a package set, why do I end up with multiple versions of Cabal? In particular I get this serious warning:

Warning:
    This package indirectly depends on multiple versions of the same package. This is very likely to cause a compile failure.
      package hackage-security (hackage-security-0.6.2.4-7CLHB9zPIN0FxCfhihIq1r) requires Cabal-syntax-3.10.3.0
      package Cabal (Cabal-3.12.1.0-HdYCe711lcf3vEdSKCpUQK) requires Cabal-syntax-3.12.1.0-JlhyVgsDFbHIDMshThsYz

Is it because those packages are not overridable (boot packages or such)? Or could it be configure-time dependencies?

12:28:56
@b:chreekat.netchreekatAm I right in assuming that usually if you override a package in a package set (examples from the file I'm modifying: https://github.com/commercialhaskell/stackage-server/blob/master/package.nix), the override you specify becomes the only version of that package available, regardless of where it lives in the dependency tree of other packages in the set?12:31:10
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniThis is true, but the core packages bundled on GHC still depend on other core packages. So if you want to globally override Cabal, you also need to globally override all core packages that (indirectly) depend on Cabal, so they get rebuilt.12:32:18
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniThen you also need to convince the cabal solver to pick those packages over the core packages which can sometimes be tricky (but usually just works).12:32:44
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterniin this case the latter seems to be happening, i.e. hackage-security is still built against the core package12:33:37
@b:chreekat.netchreekatOk, so my memory/intuition was fairly correct. How can I do a "null" override for hackage-security and any other packages, so they get rebuilt? certainly not just hackage-security = old.hackage-security, ... 12:36:19
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsternishould be rebuild as it has a Cabal input. Check what version it is and what constraints it has on Cabal. Maybe it just doesn't allow 3.12.12:39:34
@b:chreekat.netchreekatcool, things seem to be progressing by setting jailbreak = true for the package. Oh, what terrors may await12:43:33
@b:chreekat.netchreekat (I thought about just bumping the nixpkgs pin to pick up a newer version of Cabal, but since this particular project is upstream of the snapshots that are upstream of nixpkgs packages I thought it would be good to ensure I can independently upgrade Cabal to pick up packages that use newer versions) 12:44:39
@b:chreekat.netchreekat damn, that changed the hash and rebuilt some stuff, but it did not get any further 12:45:35
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni you can try passing --constraint=Cabal>=3.12 as a configure flag 12:46:33
@b:chreekat.netchreekatooh, neat, searching for a flag like that found some good examples of massaging dependencies on Cabal12:48:47

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6