| 8 Apr 2025 |
 emily | probably vcunat tweaked it because the queue is huge right now and we need to do -next cycles before release | 14:02:08 |
 vcunat | I haven't touched it recently. | 14:02:50 |
| vcunat | But it's possible that it's some long leftover. | 14:03:05 |
| vcunat | Though in that case someone must've been triggering those evals. | 14:03:34 |
| vcunat | * Though in that case someone must've been triggering those evals manually. | 14:03:41 |
| vcunat | (which I did now) | 14:04:34 |
| vcunat | * (which I did right now) | 14:04:42 |
 maralorn | Oh, true. Looks like sterni has been triggering them manually. | 14:04:51 |
| maralorn | Which is actually kinda fine for me. But I need to know it’s the case. 😄 | 14:05:05 |
| vcunat | Do you want trigger permissions? | 14:05:30 |
| vcunat | I don't mind adjusting the settings, too. | 14:06:33 |
| vcunat | We just need to share Hydra's resources reasonably. I'm not aware of a big hurry with staging-next right now even. | 14:07:59 |
| vcunat | Today even all kind of changes are allowed in staging (theoretically). Tomorrow is the first small freezing step, but there's ample time after it. | 14:10:55 |
 alexfmpe | huh shouldn't we merge haskell-updates ASAP given staging window for 25.05 is closing fast? | 14:12:43 |
| vcunat | My reading of the schedule is that breaking changes (e.g. in haskell packages) are allowed up to 2025-04-23. | 14:19:27 |
| vcunat | Non-breaking mass rebuilds up to some early May. | 14:20:14 |
| vcunat | But well - in the worst case, important fixes get backported to stable continually. | 14:20:48 |
 sterni (he/him) | We just need to meet the window for breaking changes in staging, shouldn't be a problem fingers crossed | 14:48:11 |
 hellwolf | thanks folks. I have been free riding your work. I should really contribute some, since I do believe I am able to. I just need to plan the time for this. | 15:32:28 |
| maralorn | We have them, don’t worry. | 15:44:38 |
| alexfmpe | Those regressions on cabal might be annoying, and bumping cabal means rebuild right?
Maybe we just bump cabal itself to 3.14.2 and then merge and go back to normal flow? | 17:55:53 |
| alexfmpe | * Those regressions on cabal might be annoying, and bumping cabal means mass rebuild right?
Maybe we just bump cabal itself to 3.14.2 and then merge and go back to normal flow? | 17:56:08 |
| maralorn | Bumping cabal-install is not a mass rebuilt. Bumping Cabal is not a thing since it's bundled with ghc. | 21:59:18 |
| 9 Apr 2025 |
 Artem | hey folks! is there a rough estimate when GHC 9.12.2 lands to master? | 02:02:36 |
 Tristan Ross | In reply to @artem.types:matrix.org
hey folks! is there a rough estimate when GHC 9.12.2 lands to master? Which branch did it land in first? I can give you a minimum estimate lol. | 02:08:14 |
| Tristan Ross | But if it's going to staging, a little hard to say but I'd say by the end of the month. | 02:08:45 |
| Tristan Ross | Depends on how things move. | 02:08:58 |
| Artem | Tristan Ross: I saw a PR merged to haskell-packages. I don't know if it progressed any further. | 02:10:15 |
| Tristan Ross | I think those go to staging | 02:10:37 |
| Tristan Ross | So depends on when that's merged | 02:10:47 |
