| 2 Aug 2025 |
 maralorn | Even nicer but minimally more complicated ist enableSeparateBinOutput. | 11:19:16 |
 magic_rb | oh my so much better | 11:21:32 |
| magic_rb | 3GB to 64MB | 11:21:36 |
| magic_rb | thanks a lot | 11:21:37 |
| magic_rb | nice, enableSeparateBinOutput also just works | 11:22:47 |
| magic_rb | this makes haskell acceptable for the usecase i wanted. (reimplementing environment.etc and i dont feel like doing it with a shell script, rather gonna write a haskell binary) | 11:23:20 |
 emily | In reply to @magic_rb:matrix.redalder.org
this makes haskell acceptable for the usecase i wanted. (reimplementing environment.etc and i dont feel like doing it with a shell script, rather gonna write a haskell binary) you know about system.etc.overlay right? | 11:25:11 |
| magic_rb | this is not for nixos | 11:25:18 |
| magic_rb | rather nixng, i need environment.etc for nixos compatibility reasons | 11:25:35 |
| emily | yeah I just mean | 11:25:44 |
| emily | you should just crib that implementation | 11:25:51 |
| emily | it's much better than the Perl nonsense | 11:25:59 |
| emily | and pretty generic | 11:26:06 |
| magic_rb | overlays dont work in containers | 11:26:07 |
| magic_rb | so its not useful | 11:26:12 |
| emily | they should in a mount namespace? | 11:26:22 |
| magic_rb | if you docker run it wont | 11:26:35 |
| magic_rb | im pretty sure | 11:26:43 |
| magic_rb | (and anyway, i wanna write my own for fun and profit) | 11:27:01 |
| emily | I think they should if you give the container a userns which you should probably do for isolation anyway l | 11:27:24 |
| emily | but sure :) | 11:27:27 |
| magic_rb | my goal with this is starting with replacing much of the shell script non sense in nixng with small haskell binaries | 11:28:11 |
| magic_rb | been planning to do that for a while | 11:28:17 |
| magic_rb | with UPX on top, it goes from 3.6MB to 700KB | 11:29:53 |
| magic_rb | nice | 11:29:54 |
| magic_rb | we shold have a UPX post build hook thing | 11:30:16 |
| magic_rb | this is actually nice, writeHaskell actually creates a equally small binary | 11:48:02 |
|  @froggymoded:matrix.org left the room. | 18:13:15 |
| 3 Aug 2025 |
 sterni (he/him) | MangoIV: will you need htree for GHC < 9.10 going forward? | 10:39:36 |
 MangoIV | No. this is intended.. Thank you for pining but since this has come up the second time now, I think I'm registered for maintainer, let me just fix it if it breaks in the future. :) | 10:41:18 |
