Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS | 723 Members | |
| For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | 145 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Jun 2025 | ||
| Latest uploaded | 15:37:43 | |
| It's a Stackage LTS and then Hackage for everything else, to be more precise, no? | 15:38:54 | |
In reply to @toonn:matrix.orgYes, as described in the nixpkgs manual. Although it could possibly be more precise on the former question | 15:45:34 | |
| 18:36:28 | ||
| 23 Jun 2025 | ||
| lambdatheultimatealias: note that you can't draw any conclusions from nixpkgs about hackage since we regularly apply patches, modify constraints, build flags, test flags etc. | 21:14:04 | |
| 22 Jun 2025 | ||
| I'm trying to fix a broken package named
However, the ffmpeg libs are still not found: | 19:46:24 | |
| Redacted or Malformed Event | 19:46:33 | |
| * I'm trying to fix a broken package named
However, the ffmpeg libs are still not found: | 19:47:18 | |
IIRC ffmpeg-light only works with ancient FFmpeg. | 19:50:01 | |
| "Tested with FFmpeg 3.1 - 3.4.2" | 19:50:46 | |
| That may be so, but I'd still like to understand why it's not finding the libs I'm giving it. | 19:51:30 | |
| * I'm trying to fix a broken package named
However, the ffmpeg libs are still not found: | 19:51:35 | |
| * I'm trying to fix a broken package named
However, the ffmpeg libs are still not found: | 19:54:00 | |
| you're not giving it an ancient FFmpeg is probably at least part of it | 19:54:45 | |
| we're on FFmpeg 7 | 19:55:00 | |
| But how is its ancientness encoded in cabal? | 19:55:00 | |
| I don't see the ffmpeg version encoded in the cabal file. It's asking for a certain set of pkgconfig libs, I'm giving it those libs. | 19:55:21 | |
| I don't see any version checks. | 19:55:25 | |
| Here's what the cabal wants:
Here's what | 19:56:37 | |
| * I don't see any version checks or reasons why a newer version wouldn't work. | 19:57:03 | |
not sure. other than the missing lib prefixes in the error maybe. | 19:57:54 | |
| 20:27:10 | ||
| Heya, a while ago I wrote a program that uses the punycode package, which is marked as broken in nixpkgs. I'm trying to figure out why but have gotten nowhere, any suggestions? | 20:28:32 | |
| * Heya, a while ago I wrote a program that uses the punycode Haskell package, which is marked as broken in nixpkgs. I'm trying to figure out why but have gotten nowhere, any suggestions? | 20:29:43 | |
In reply to @sasha:the-apothecary.clubHave you looked for a "broken.yaml" file in nixpkgs and read the line in the corresponding comment? | 20:47:48 | |
| Also have you tried just building it by overriding/ignoring the broken flag? | 20:48:25 | |
In reply to @maralorn:maralorn.deI did not because I didn't know that existed. Thx! | 20:49:58 | |
| 23 Jun 2025 | ||
| Hey all! I'm routinely getting strange "missing dependencies" errors when trying to build with
happens to various dependencies when building various packages... | 17:51:06 | |
| I saw reports like that on Discourse but none of the suggestions looked particularly relevant... | 17:51:35 | |
In reply to @artem.types:matrix.org Are you trying to override the Boot libraries have special handling and cannot be overridden in the usual way. | 18:52:14 | |