| 1 May 2025 |
 alexfmpe | Need to page down a few times even after search-navigation to "foopackage" | 22:20:31 |
 maralorn | I lobbied a lot for a more compact layout, but I got overruled (which is fair). | 22:33:37 |
| maralorn | Especially I understand that diffs are a large concern in nixpkgs. | 22:34:31 |
| alexfmpe | Ah well, generated files get hidden diffs by default | 22:36:00 |
| alexfmpe | Though in this case you'd get smaller diffs? | 22:36:17 |
| alexfmpe | With the old cabal2nix output, having a few new deps would shift all the lines no? | 22:36:38 |
| alexfmpe | * With the old cabal2nix output, having a few new deps would shift all the lines after them no? | 22:36:48 |
| alexfmpe | Speaking of hackage-packages.nix, why are there so many doHaddock = false in there? | 22:37:38 |
| alexfmpe | I thought my sweep for overrides script was bugged for haddock | 22:37:56 |
| alexfmpe | Because barely any show up in configuration-common.nix | 22:38:20 |
|  oak 🏳️🌈♥️ changed their display name from oak - mikatammi.fi to oak. | 23:17:55 |
| oak 🏳️🌈♥️ changed their display name from oak to oak 🫱⭕🫲. | 23:18:25 |
| 2 May 2025 |
 thirdofmay18081814goya | nice, ty! | 00:07:42 |
 cdepillabout | I wonder why it was decided to autoformat the generated files. hackage-packages.nix was pretty readable to begin with. | 06:51:42 |
 sterni (he/him) | cabal2nix emits this if there's no library component | 07:37:36 |
 hellwolf | I guess I missed something. I thought upon the merging of the latest haskell-updates branch, the default ghc should become 9.8? I have not seen that happen.
(I don't depend on that, but I am just curious) | 10:28:26 |
| hellwolf | oh, my bad. It was not merged to master yet. | 10:29:11 |
|  chreekat changed their profile picture. | 10:36:28 |
| maralorn | I recommend querying nixpkgs-bot with s 371032 😉 | 10:39:36 |
| maralorn | Redacted or Malformed Event | 10:40:01 |
| alexfmpe | that's odd, I explicitly check for that | 12:31:02 |
| alexfmpe | v.isHaskellLibrary && !(lib.hasInfix "Setup haddock" v.haddockPhase); | 12:31:04 |
| sterni (he/him) | well the haddock phase is always there is it not? | 12:31:58 |
| alexfmpe | the phase yes but not the infix | 12:34:20 |
| alexfmpe | nix-repl> haskellPackages.attoparsec.isHaskellLibrary
true
nix-repl> haskellPackages.attoparsec.haddockPhase
"runHook preHaddock\n\nrunHook postHaddock\n"
| 12:34:25 |
| alexfmpe | attoparsec has doHaddock = false on hackage-packages.nix | 12:34:38 |
| alexfmpe | though this did reveal a somewhat confusing convention on my script with regards to defaults | 12:36:58 |
| sterni (he/him) | probably due to doHaddockPhase | not (null internalLibNames) = False | 12:52:29 |
| sterni (he/him) | Would be nice to figure out the ins and outs of the named libs stuff once and for all, maybe we can improve some stuff now | 12:53:12 |
| alexfmpe | ah attoparsec does have internal lib yes | 12:53:27 |
