Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS | 724 Members | |
| For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | 144 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Mar 2025 | ||
| 16:02:58 | ||
| @sternenseemann:systemli.org what would be my route to getting GHC on aarch64 musl in Nixpkgs, ideally relatively soon? They have binaries for 6.8 but nothing older, and my previous strategy of just avoiding anything with a pandoc input is getting more and more difficult. | 16:04:42 | |
| I've
in
| 19:55:35 | |
| Doesn't seem that HLS for 9.2 is available in my $PATH? | 19:55:51 | |
| Can you do an ls on the output of the derivation? | 20:51:10 | |
In reply to @a12l:matrix.org
This is probably why. You need | 21:29:12 | |
maralorn, Alex It seems that haskell-language-server-9.2.8 is in my $PATH when I try to autocomplete in the terminal. | 21:58:21 | |
May be that. But why do I need to specify 927? Why doesn't 928 show up when I run haskell-language-server-wrapper when 966 shows up? | 21:59:56 | |
In reply to @qyliss:fairydust.space Have you tried getting it through IIRC | 22:00:52 | |
In reply to @a12l:matrix.orgBecause 92 means "the latest available revision of 9.2" and that happens to be 9.2.8, not 9.2.7.For 96, 9.6.6 is the latest revision in Nixpkgs so that's what you get. | 22:02:24 | |
I understand why you get 9.2.8 when you specify 92, but why does 9.6.6 show up when running haskell-language-server-wrapper and not 9.2.8? In that project 9.2.8 is more correct that 9.6.6 | 22:05:22 | |
| I don't think it's chosen to use either version? HLS needs the exact same version as the compiler, so the wrapper gave up altogether when it failed to find a HLS for 9.2.7. | 22:06:51 | |
| * I don't think it has chosen to use either version? HLS needs the exact same version as the compiler, so the wrapper gave up altogether when it failed to find a HLS for 9.2.7. | 22:06:58 | |
| 1 Apr 2025 | ||
| 00:19:59 | ||
| Hey, I'm using NixOS & Cabal & GHC 9.12.1. I want to utilize hmatrix-gls (0.19.0.1). But cabal new-build all --preference="Cabal >= 3.14.1.1" --keep-going --enable-debug-info=3 inside of nix develop --impure --expr 'with import <nixpkgs> {}; mkShell rec { buildInputs = [pkg-config zlib blas lapack gsl]; LD_LIBRARY_PATH = lib.makeLibraryPath buildInputs;}' leads to <no location info>: error: …/libgsl.so: undefined symbol: cblas_ctrmv. Any idea? Thx in advance! | 00:52:19 | |
Among other things, I've tried to (1) utilize openblas instead of blas and to (2) link dynamically by shared: True↵executable-dynamic: True. | 00:52:56 | |
| 00:57:46 | ||
| 01:03:16 | ||
| 01:03:44 | ||
In reply to @alex:tunstall.xyzThat's what I'm doing. It is not cross compiled. | 07:09:44 | |
| Alex: It works now! Thanks for the help! | 07:26:50 | |
| It natively bootstraps from a GHC-provided binary, but for 9.2.4 (current bootstrap) compiler, that's only available for x86_64: nixpkgs/ | 08:30:30 | |
| * | 08:30:39 | |
| What's the "canonical" way of applying an overlay to all haskell packages? Can't seem to find it in the manual, and I think what I did back in the day was do it manually for the specific haskell packages I was using. | 18:36:19 | |
| canonical -> idiomatic | 18:36:32 | |
| Something like this? https://github.com/HaskellEmbedded/ivory-tower-nix/blob/main/nix/env.nix#L6-L11 | 19:20:20 | |
In reply to @srk:matrix.distrap.orgBut that doesn’t apply to all of them | 19:21:38 | |
It does as it overrides mkDerivation of the package set | 19:23:18 | |
| srk ⚡️: I think my original message was ambiguous. I mean applying it to all haskellPackages's | 22:52:40 | |
| * What's the "canonical" way of applying an overlay to all haskellPackages's? Can't seem to find it in the manual, and I think what I did back in the day was do it manually for the specific haskellPackages's I was using. | 22:53:02 | |