| 9 Mar 2025 |
emily | of course not 🙃 | 15:42:08 |
maralorn | Why of course?^^ | 15:42:24 |
emily | looks weird. maybe a timeout? | 15:42:44 |
emily | that would make too much sense. | 15:42:47 |
alexfmpe | Conveying sarcasm over the internet is hard | 17:29:41 |
emily | I did put an upside down face in there :P | 17:30:19 |
| 10 Mar 2025 |
| Mr Mayhem changed their display name from ð’€±Lord Mayhem of the Magnolias to Magnolia Mayhem. | 01:49:04 |
| 11 Mar 2025 |
| blackglasses changed their profile picture. | 07:58:35 |
| dyniec changed their profile picture. | 13:40:03 |
| 12 Mar 2025 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 02:44:37 |
| @jellyterra:matrix.org changed their profile picture. | 02:45:55 |
| 14 Mar 2025 |
Profpatsch | Why is generateOptparseApplicativeCompletions not just an input to haskellPackages.makeDerivation? | 13:32:54 |
Profpatsch | I’m getting an error like | 13:38:28 |
Profpatsch | at /nix/store/a396z42saqql55cp5n1vrb2j0siq86k1-nixpkgs-src/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/generic-builder.nix:32:1: | 13:38:30 |
Profpatsch | error: function 'anonymous lambda' called with unexpected argument 'mkDerivation' | 13:38:30 |
Profpatsch | passing hself.generateOptparseApplicativeCompletions ["foo"] (hself.mkDerivation { pname = … }) | 13:39:49 |
Profpatsch | Ah uh do I need to pass it to callPackage as well … | 13:43:26 |
Profpatsch | brrrr | 13:43:42 |
| 15 Mar 2025 |
alexfmpe | 9.12.2 just got released, should we squeeze it into current haskell-updates? | 19:09:06 |
alexfmpe | it supposedly fixes the codegen bug in 9.12.1 | 19:09:33 |
alexfmpe | cargoculted my way into a PR, currently checking it's not horribly broken https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/390207 | 19:43:28 |
| 16 Mar 2025 |
Tristan Ross | Does that mean we could squeeze in the LLVM bump stuff? (https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/379039). I really would like to get LLVM 12 out of nixpkgs for 25.05. I noticed that the patch recommended does not work in the bootstrap part because cannot patch a prebuilt binary with it. But I remember some discussions around other solutions. I think this is a best effort PR we can get to be able to get LLVM 12 dropped. | 05:39:59 |