!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

743 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org148 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
28 May 2021
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutThat's a good point. I assumed we did, but I dunno. I don't personally care about them.09:03:08
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout Although mergeable and maintained are both failing now. 09:03:31
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout Err, maybe it is just maintained that is failing? 09:05:09
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutSometimes I have a hard time figuring out exactly what is failing on Hydra, especially when build statuses get cached.09:06:04
@aria:e2e.zonearia joined the room.09:08:34
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout * Sometimes I have a hard time figuring out exactly what is failing on Hydra, especially when builds incorrectly fail, and then build statuses get cached.09:10:07
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornWell, if there are problems you can obviously pass on the torch.09:10:48
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him) cdepillabout: sometimes the status of the aggregate jobs is stale and you need to restart (just) the aggregate job 09:39:25
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)but nevertheless I can look into it :)09:39:35
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)and do the merge of course09:39:55
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him) I would like to take some time the next two weeks going over the list of jobs in mergeable if you guys have any ideas on how to expand / change the list I'd be interestetd to hear it 09:41:34
@zwro:matrix.orgzwro changed their display name from zzz to zwro.11:42:19
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout
In reply to @sternenseemann:systemli.org
cdepillabout: sometimes the status of the aggregate jobs is stale and you need to restart (just) the aggregate job
Ah, I was actually wondering about that. Restarting the mergeable or maintained job should also restart all of its failed child jobs?
12:09:48
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutI had thought that I had tried that once and it didn't work, but maybe I was just mistaken.12:10:05
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)
In reply to @cdepillabout:matrix.org
Ah, I was actually wondering about that. Restarting the mergeable or maintained job should also restart all of its failed child jobs?
no, that's the point it doesn't restart any of the aggregated jobs
12:10:32
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)but if something was fixed by restarting for example the aggregate job doesn't get updated so you'd need to restart it12:10:52
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)so restarting it only helps with stale failures12:11:13
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornI mean that’s not even special for aggregate jobs. All jobs don‘t update automatically if they failed because of a broken dependency and then that dependency got fixed.12:12:00
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutAh, I see what you're saying. So if the aggregate job has a child job that has failed, you need to restart both the failed child job and the aggregate jobset?12:12:19
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)yep12:12:28
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutMan, that's somewhat annoying12:12:50
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralorn
In reply to @cdepillabout:matrix.org
Man, that's somewhat annoying
Yeah, the most annoying part is, that you can‘t selectively bulk restart jobs.
12:16:24
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutAh, yeah, so you have to go to each failed job and manually restart it.12:17:03
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornOr you restart all failed jobs, but that will produce a lot of unnecessary work.12:17:51
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillaboutimage.png
Download image.png
12:20:01
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout Oh, good point. I see that there is the Restart all failed builds option. Although you're completely right, that would create a lot of unnecessary work. 12:20:46
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)may be a good shout though when we have a lot of dubious build failures again12:21:40
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout At some point in the not-too-far future, maybe we can correctly mark all darwin/aarch64 builds that don't work broken, so our "failing jobs" will really be unexpected failures. In that case, I imagine there will be a lot less failed builds, so restarting all failed builds should cause much less work. 12:22:31
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him)seems like we are getting almost none of the queue because three jobsets have much more queued builds than us :'( 12:22:47
@sternenseemann:systemli.orgsterni (he/him) cdepillabout: yeah I'm planning-ish to work on that 12:23:17

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6