| 29 May 2021 |
 maralorn | srid: Las: Are you okay with this? | 19:14:25 |
| maralorn | (I really like how this room bridges channels.) | 19:14:35 |
| maralorn | * (I really like how this room bridges spaces.) | 19:14:44 |
 Las | That looks nice to me | 19:14:43 |
| Las | wdym bridges spaces? | 19:14:55 |
| maralorn | Las: It is part of the Haskell space and the nixos space. So if someone finds one of those spaces they have now a likely chance to discover the other one, too. | 19:15:59 |
| Las | What haskell space? | 19:16:12 |
| Las | I had never considered that that was possible, but it makes sense. | 19:16:35 |
| maralorn | The one in the topic. ;-) | 19:16:48 |
| Las | Ah, lol | 19:16:57 |
| Las | I didn't read what was written carefully, just copied and pasted it | 19:17:15 |
| maralorn | I actually didn‘t link exactly the Haskell room but the space. Which seems slightly better to me, but not sure. | 19:18:05 |
| Las | No I think that's best | 19:18:25 |
| Las | There isn't a backward link to the containing rooms otherwise after all. | 19:18:39 |
| Las | * There isn't a backward link to the containing spaces otherwise after all. | 19:18:46 |
| 30 May 2021 |
 cdepillabout | Man, our darwin builds really just aren't moving at all. | 02:55:28 |
| maralorn | I think they are the same builds that are keeping staging-next. | 03:15:51 |
| cdepillabout | maralorn: Do you mean there is also a queue on staging-next, and that is what is keeping our jobs from getting run? | 04:14:15 |
|  hxliew joined the room. | 05:35:02 |
|  fgaz joined the room. | 11:06:18 |
|  rizary_andika (@rizary_:matrix.org) (@rizary:matrix.org) joined the room. | 17:42:14 |
| 31 May 2021 |
|  kosmikus joined the room. | 06:28:26 |
| maralorn | In reply to @cdepillabout:matrix.org
maralorn: Do you mean there is also a queue on staging-next, and that is what is keeping our jobs from getting run? I am not sure but I think the same jobs that we are waiting for were also uncompleted in staging-next. Although they probably have different hashes. | 07:51:44 |
| maralorn | I find this deeply unsatisfying. If I understood it correctly one of the reasons that we have such a hard time for getting darwin builders is apples restrictive licensing. | 07:54:36 |
| maralorn | I don't like that our volunteer efforts for free software are being hampered by this at all. I vote for any solutions that make us less bothered by darwin builds. | 07:58:42 |
| maralorn | * I find this deeply unsatisfying. If I understood it correctly one of the reasons that we have such a hard time getting darwin builders is apples restrictive licensing. | 07:59:16 |
| maralorn | With that I mean: Let's deactivate all failing darwin build as soon as possible. And I guess I would even like to ignore unfinished darwin builds when merging. But that's probably hard to argue for. | 08:03:11 |
 joe (he/him) | I wonder if there's a smarter way of partitioning them, for example for my vulkan library CI is gated on OS X because there are separate linking/compilation flags on that system, but other packages are OS agnostic, and testing on OS X and Linux is pointless | 08:08:42 |
| maralorn | We have a recently introduced configuration-darwin.nix which is exactly for collecting darwin specific overrides. | 08:10:11 |
|  [0x4A6F] changed their display name from [0x4A6F] to 0x4A6F. | 08:23:50 |
