| 22 May 2021 |
 joe | oh, should this be against haskell-updates or master? | 07:48:35 |
 cdepillabout | I guess both, really. We won't merge haskell-updates into master again before the branch-off, so you'll need to update haskell-updates as well as then backport it to either master or release-21.05. | 07:49:51 |
| joe | OK, in that case I'll pr against h-u and maser, (when is the branchoff?) | 07:51:56 |
| joe | * OK, in that case I'll pr against h-u and master, (when is the branchoff?) | 07:52:09 |
| cdepillabout | I think the branch off was supposed to be yesterday, but I'm not sure what happened. I assume it will be soon though. | 07:58:21 |
|  chvp joined the room. | 08:15:55 |
| joe | cdepillabout: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/123990 and https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/123991
Thanks for the guidance
| 08:31:39 |
 maralorn | In reply to @cdepillabout:matrix.org
Okay, if maralorn doesn't oppose this, I'll reach out to @rnhmjoj and see if he'd be willing to volunteer. Static building seems great. Maintainers seem great. Go for all of it! | 10:06:30 |
|  jul1u5 joined the room. | 11:14:20 |
|  evils joined the room. | 11:23:53 |
| evils left the room. | 11:44:35 |
 sterni | John Ericson: on a different note, we probably should also stop pinning it to musl since glibc.static has been around for quite some time | 12:31:42 |
|  andi- removed their profile picture. | 13:26:17 |
|  barryfm joined the room. | 13:28:41 |
| andi- set a profile picture. | 13:34:06 |
|  dualinverter joined the room. | 16:11:32 |
|  pwmosquito joined the room. | 16:22:04 |
 John Ericson | sterni: hmm ok | 17:06:26 |
| John Ericson | i just assumed there was some issue with glibc static | 17:06:37 |
| John Ericson | but would be cool if there wasn't | 17:06:43 |
| sterni | from reading the code I got the impression that at the time there was no glibc.static and it wasn't changed since then, but I could be wrong | 17:31:02 |
| sterni | pennae: with -j1 tests no longer fail, so seems to be indeed a race condition | 18:41:19 |
 pennae | good to know :< | 18:46:12 |
| sterni | upstream knows™ now | 18:48:24 |
| pennae | heh, SEP :D | 18:48:36 |
| sterni | also I really have to add a proper way to pass flags to the test invocation | 18:48:37 |
| sterni | the testTarget trick I have been doing is something to be ashamed of | 18:49:01 |
| * pennae check what that could be | 18:50:36 |
| pennae | .. eh, could be worse | 18:51:38 |
| sterni | it's just a bit annoying ideally we wann just reuse mkDerivation's checkFlags, but we already have it called testTarget | 18:52:36 |
