!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

691 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure138 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
12 Sep 2025
@bglgwyng:matrix.orgbglgwyng* Hmm I'm trying haskell.nix now. Actually, I should build my package to bootstrap things, so that how to build it is not important.08:33:34
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornBest explanation I can think of is that there is a dependency chain cabal-install -> X -> hackage-security, where X is a core package distributed with ghc. Then X would not be affected by the overrideScope and thus use the wrong hackage-security. But this is close to where I normally give up …08:34:07
@oak:universumi.fioak 🏳️‍🌈♥️ The maintainer scripts maintainers/scripts/haskell/ seem broken, I get this error with multiple scripts: error: access to absolute path '/home/myusername/.local' is forbidden in restricted mode 13:08:51
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornOverriding core adjacent packages is just a pain and actually the one time where I switched to haskell.nix …08:34:42
@oak:universumi.fioak 🏳️‍🌈♥️ ./maintainers/scripts/haskell/regenerate-hackage-packages.sh --fast goes through, but without --fast I get the above error 13:11:37
@aidalgol:tchncs.de@aidalgol:tchncs.de set a profile picture.09:21:40

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6