| 23 Feb 2025 |
 alexfmpe | huh actually no, that seems to change the hash and cause a rebuild but not actually disable jailbreak | 01:37:35 |
| alexfmpe | riiight I need overrideCabal instead
it only worked for doCheck since that's also an argument of mkDerivation | 01:44:21 |
|  @linucifer:envs.net removed their profile picture. | 17:24:48 |
| @linucifer:envs.net removed their display name linucifer. | 17:24:54 |
| @linucifer:envs.net left the room. | 17:24:56 |
|  John Wiegley set a profile picture. | 21:03:07 |
| 24 Feb 2025 |
|  rein joined the room. | 15:28:58 |
| 25 Feb 2025 |
 silky | does anyone know how to resolve this problem
> Configuring th-desugar-1.15...
> Error: [Cabal-8010]
> Encountered missing or private dependencies:
> template-haskell >=2.11 && <2.21, th-abstraction >=0.5 && <0.7
with th-desguar?
| 13:52:02 |
| silky | as far as i can see the dependencies are listed in the derivation on nixpkgs | 13:52:17 |
| silky | and they are in the relevant cabal file - https://github.com/goldfirere/th-desugar/blob/v1.15/th-desugar.cabal | 13:53:20 |
| silky | 🤷 | 13:53:23 |
 maralorn | silky: Problem is most likely that the version provided in nixpkgs does not match. | 13:54:23 |
| silky | yeah that's what i was starting to think ... :/ | 13:54:40 |
| maralorn | Solutions are: jailbreak/patch/override. | 13:55:07 |
| silky | true | 13:55:39 |
| maralorn | If you give me more context: i.e. ghc version and nixpkgs branch you are using I can tell which I assume is most likely to work. | 13:56:22 |
| silky | i'm on unstable and ghc9101 ; i just tried jailbreak and it did not work 🥲🥲🥲 | 13:57:25 |
| silky | lies, 24.11, not unstable. | 13:57:42 |
| silky | ( trying unstable ) | 13:58:03 |
| silky | i guess it's not very promising if it doesn't even compile at all | 13:58:48 |
| silky | when jailbreaking | 13:58:53 |
| silky | so maybe i could try jailbreaking whoever is depending on that old version | 13:59:06 |
| maralorn | currently unstable and haskell-updates are also quite diverged. | 13:59:12 |
| silky | is haskell-updates a branch i should try instead? ( never done that 👀 ) | 14:00:10 |
| maralorn | Also, there is currently even th-desuger 1.18, might make much more sense to try that. | 14:00:34 |
| maralorn | It’s generally not recommendet. But if you are lucky it might work in this case. | 14:01:03 |
| maralorn | lemme check for you | 14:01:53 |
| silky | cheers; i'm trying too just waiting on a large rebuild i guess 😅 | 14:03:04 |
| maralorn | Huh, so the th-desugar in haskell-updates is 1.16 | 14:03:58 |
| maralorn | Which does not claim to be compatible with ghc 9.10. | 14:04:17 |
