!RbXGJhHMsnQcNIDFWN:nixos.org

Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS

686 Members
For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell | Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates | Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now | Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure136 Servers

You have reached the beginning of time (for this room).


SenderMessageTime
30 Sep 2025
@maralorn:maralorn.demaralornMost hls updates need next to no intervention actually, now that I think about it. The annoying thing is mainly to keep HLS building while upgrading stackage because that breaks the aforementioned manually fixed build plans.16:02:30
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIVWhy do you not distribute HLS bindists btw?16:04:42
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV Wouldn’t that be much easier 16:04:48
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV I am already careful to split the package set for tooling from the one for development anyway 16:06:20
@mangoiv.:matrix.orgMangoIV There’s no reason for me to share them 16:06:27

Show newer messages


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6