Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS | 718 Members | |
| For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs | Current Docs: https://haskell4nix.readthedocs.io/ | More Nix: #community:nixos.org | More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org | 143 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Jun 2025 | ||
| Following up on ners's point, there's this comment in
I'm wondering if it still stands because I was able to build stuff locally | 16:27:44 | |
Ah wait, never mind. I can't read. I was reading pkgsMusl instead of pkgsStatic. For pkgsStatic, it says "times out on Hydra" | 16:29:21 | |
* Ah wait, never mind. I can't read. I was reading pkgsMusl instead of pkgsStatic. For pkgsStatic, it says "times out on Hydra". Is there any chance to get an exception there? | 16:29:49 | |
In reply to @ners:nixos.devMy guess, without looking at Hydra, is that it could potentially break the path size limit. | 17:17:56 | |
| this fixes it, rebuilding the tool as you suggested, review please: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/421127 | 21:58:21 | |
| 30 Jun 2025 | ||
| maralorn any thoughts? | 09:51:30 | |
| I am sadly quite unfamiliar with the policys around hydra timeouts. I guess there have to exist exceptions for something like chromium? But I think in Haskell world we never had one? | 10:06:57 | |
| * I am sadly quite unfamiliar with the policies around hydra timeouts. I guess there have to exist exceptions for something like chromium? But I think in Haskell world we never had one? | 10:07:10 | |
| 1 Jul 2025 | ||
ners: in principle the timeout is configurable per derivation. That comment is from 2021, though, so it may no longer be accurate for the builders we currently have. Currently, it doesn't make a difference since haskell-updates is not tested on aarch64-linux at all. I don't know when/if that is going to change. Also, haskell-updates is relatively disconnected from master these days, so you will get cache misses even on x86_64-linux (haskell-updates is for catching regressions primarily, not populating the binary cache). Feel free to open a PR adding jobs for pkgsStatic haskell to release.nix or maybe release-cross.nix which are intended for testing/populating binary cache on master. | 09:54:04 | |
| going to merge h-u this evening probably | 16:01:25 | |
| staging-next cycle is probably starting soon | 16:01:36 | |
| @sternenseemann:systemli.org At this point I have the feeling our rotation is kinda broken. | 16:43:52 | |
| As in theoretically it's my two weeks to do the merging. | 16:44:47 | |
| I mean I am not complaining. | 16:45:06 | |
| But I think in the longterm its better for everyone if we spread this on multiple shoulders. | 16:46:26 | |
| 2 Jul 2025 | ||
| 19:50:08 | ||
| 3 Jul 2025 | ||
| I'm really bad at putting up my feet when it's not my turn unfortunately | 10:37:37 | |
| Yeah, but also since I got used to do doing the stuff I 1) got slower and 2) am not even sure I know how to do it now. 😆 | 11:08:07 | |
| I'm trying to get a broken package to build (glft-codec) currently it's complaining about Aeson being too new, the currect version has a <2.2, but Aeson is on 2.2, I assume it'll just work if I can modify the symantic versioning but I can't figure out how to get it to work, I cloned the repo but flakes are complaining about the files missing (probably due to submodules), I wonder what I should do here before I dig myself in to a bigger hole. | 17:05:16 | |
| @woobilicious:matrix.org Apply haskell.lib.doJailbreak to your package. No need to clone or patch7 | 17:19:58 | |
| thanks I'll try that. | 17:21:09 | |
| Plenty of examples in nixpkgs if you grep | 17:22:57 | |
| brillant it worked, only issue was tests failing due to missing asset files, disabled tests and imports are working | 17:37:26 | |
| 18:46:50 | ||
Hey there! I hope some questions are appreciated. I'm trying to bump nix-tree (after asking the developer a while back to bump in hackage https://github.com/utdemir/nix-tree/issues/114#issuecomment-2888634183 ) assuming it would get updated eventually by nixos maintainers and the file says that you should use the regenerate-hackage-packages.sh but that fails on my local machine - I'd like to get in touch with the people maintaining that and assumed there was a Haskell Matrix channel maybe (there aren't a lot of GitHub issues around Hackage/Haskell lately if I'm not mistaken). | 18:51:28 | |
| 18:51:46 | |
Reading the history of this channel I can see others also ran into thread blocked indefinitely in an MVar operation. I'm not sure if it the script is fully needed getting nix-tree usable again for others :). | 18:53:34 | |
| https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/issues/409085 ah I didn't get follow up github notifications. https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/409117#issuecomment-2895401376 | 18:55:05 | |
| Well at least I gave updating hackage packages a try for once, good to learn how that is done under the hood. | 18:57:00 | |
| * Hey there! I've had some questions, I understand the situation now... Old message/thread: I'm trying to bump nix-tree (after asking the developer a while back to bump in hackage https://github.com/utdemir/nix-tree/issues/114#issuecomment-2888634183 ) assuming it would get updated eventually by nixos maintainers and the file says that you should use the regenerate-hackage-packages.sh but that fails on my local machine - I'd like to get in touch with the people maintaining that and assumed there was a Haskell Matrix channel maybe (there aren't a lot of GitHub issues around Hackage/Haskell lately if I'm not mistaken). | 19:00:25 | |