Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS - Public Room Timeline

	Haskell in Nixpkgs/NixOS	705 Members
	For discussions and questions about Haskell with Nix, cabal2nix and haskellPackages in nixpkgs \| Current Docs: https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/unstable/#haskell \| Current PR: https://github.com/nixos/nixpkgs/pulls?q=is%3Apr+is%3Aopen+head%3Ahaskell-updates \| Maintainer Docs: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/haskell-updates/pkgs/development/haskell-modules/HACKING.md \| More Nix: #community:nixos.org \| More Haskell: #haskell-space:matrix.org \| Merger Schedule: https://cloud.maralorn.de/apps/calendar/p/H6migHmKX7xHoTFa/dayGridMonth/now \| Join #haskell.nix:libera.chat for question about the alternative haskell.nix infrastructure	140 Servers

Sender	Message	Time
21 Sep 2025
emily	in the case on that PR, `xattr(1)` was dutifully reporting that it failed to strip `com.apple.provenance` I suppose, and the installation procedure was unhappy	20:07:21
22 Sep 2025
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.org	sterni should we cherry-pick all the fixes we're not making to staging-next into haskell-updates?	11:44:41
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.org	* sterni should we cherry-pick all the fixes we're now making to staging-next into haskell-updates?	11:44:47
maralorn	My suggestion would be to pause work on h-u until staging-next is merged?	11:57:22
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.org	For possibly a full week or more?	12:09:35
maralorn	Is that unreasonable?	12:15:35
sterni	I think it makes sense to stage a bunch of set rebuilding changes on the branch and use a time when the x86_64-linux queue has calmed down a bit to get through it	12:24:16
sterni	24.11 rebuilds everything again	12:24:21
@wolfgangwalther:matrix.org	Imho, yes. That's essentially just making the next cycle much longer.	12:24:21
sterni	package set update seems to eval already at https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/445051	12:26:38