| 5 Jun 2021 |
 sterni (he/him) | since I guess distribution-nixpkgs depends on it | 17:04:08 |
 Las | Really? I must have done something for it not to be fetched from cache then | 17:04:15 |
| Las | For GHC 9? | 17:04:20 |
| sterni (he/him) | yes | 17:04:25 |
| Las | Huh | 17:04:28 |
 toonn | maralorn: Why would you use builtins.attrValues rather than `with lib.maintainers; [ a b ];`? | 17:04:56 |
| sterni (he/him) | when did you try? non standard packages were not built on hydra until a few weeks ago I suspect for non x86_64-linux | 17:04:56 |
| sterni (he/him) | well it wouldn't have the discussed scoping issue | 17:05:26 |
 maralorn | toonn: Because it guarantees that a b come actually from lib.maintainers. | 17:05:46 |
| sterni (he/him) | but I'm still sticking with [ lib.maintainers.a lib.maintainers.b] tbh | 17:05:48 |
| toonn | Wait, with doesn't shadow? | 17:06:23 |
| maralorn | toonn: Nope, it doesnât. | 17:06:31 |
| sterni (he/him) | it does not | 17:06:30 |
| Las | If it did that would be horrible | 17:06:36 |
| sterni (he/him) | well both solutions to the issue are kinda bad tbh | 17:06:53 |
| Las | let x = y; in with z; [x] would have a different meaning depending on what z contains | 17:07:07 |
