| 28 Aug 2025 |
 emily | (which I think would look like: "if the default llvmPackages was bumped and we're on haskell-updates, then warn Haskell maintainers") | 20:22:30 |
 maralorn | emily: Sadly, I have no clue and would have to research the supported versions llvm-ffi. Generally deactivating a warning that blocks you while pinging involved people seems fine. Possibly the person with the most bandwidth to think about this is wolfgangwalther who is not here but is already part of the conversation on github. | 20:28:47 |
| emily | I talked about the warning with sterni in #staging:nixos.org recently :) | 20:29:04 |
| emily | but I don't recall what the concrete conclusion was | 20:29:09 |
| maralorn | Well, I’ll take the opportunity and join that room now. | 20:30:46 |
 sterni (he/him) | llvm-ffi 21.0.0.2 should support LLVM 21 proper | 20:33:42 |
| emily | we don't have that on master, though | 20:34:33 |
| sterni (he/him) | Either bump it manually until the upgrade trickles through via haskell-updates or remove the warning as long as the build doesn't break either should work. | 20:34:57 |
| emily | we could cherry-pick it but it feels dubious for updating an LLVM off an rc to get blocked on this when we haven't even bumped the default version yet | 20:35:01 |
| sterni (he/him) | yes | 20:35:27 |
| sterni (he/him) | I wrote that code when LLVM default was a few versions back, seems like now where it's practically latest we could also sync it with the default version | 20:36:03 |
| sterni (he/him) | instead of latest available | 20:36:07 |
|  Las changed their profile picture. | 20:36:52 |
| emily | right | 20:36:55 |
