!SgYlXivkogarTVcnZO:nixos.org

Nix Flakes

887 Members
181 Servers

Load older messages


SenderMessageTime
5 Oct 2021
@balsoft:balsoft.rubalsoft
In reply to @roosemberth:orbstheorem.ch
Yes, flakes is a high entry point.
Eh, compared to nix-env interface...
18:35:49
@roosemberth:orbstheorem.chRoosI tried to onboard a friend not so long ago and discovered lots of plumbing stuff myself x)18:35:55
@edrex:matrix.orgedrexthanks, it helps to know others are sharing my misery :D18:37:46
@edrex:matrix.orgedrexflakes does seem to have a conceptual economy, and it basically makes sense to me18:38:17
@roosemberth:orbstheorem.chRoosxD18:38:20
@roosemberth:orbstheorem.chRoosI wouldn't say it's a good thing x)18:38:49
@edrex:matrix.orgedrex balsoft i started a profile with latest nix following your instructions, thanks 18:45:25
@edrex:matrix.orgedrexoh but the fix isn't in the nix repo yet, only in nixpkgs. trying again18:46:55
@edrex:matrix.orgedrexoh the fix i'm trying to get is actually a patch to stdenv18:55:37
@edrex:matrix.orgedrexinstalling a different stdenv seems like it would require rebuilding the world. hmm18:56:37
@edrex:matrix.orgedrexhttps://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/pull/138334/files18:56:58
@artturin:matrix.orgArtturin joined the room.18:59:02
6 Oct 2021
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈well, I called it with the registry05:17:30
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈but I guess I'm not enterprise enough, some people seem really into it05:18:05
@balsoft:balsoft.rubalsoft
In reply to @colemickens:matrix.org
but I guess I'm not enterprise enough, some people seem really into it
I feel called out :D
05:18:21
@balsoft:balsoft.rubalsoftI feel it's really convinient for managing a lot of repositories with overlapping dependencies, though05:19:01
@colemickens:matrix.orgcolemickens 🏳️‍🌈I don't understand what you can do with it that you can't do with "..follows" other than specifically introduce machine or other-place indirection. Or why that property is helpful other than confusion the confusion shown earlier.06:51:00
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout

When I run nix develop in my repo with a flake.nix, I get some sort of warning message related to git:

$ nix develop
hint: Using 'master' as the name for the initial branch. This default branch name
hint: is subject to change. To configure the initial branch name to use in all
hint: of your new repositories, which will suppress this warning, call:
hint: 
hint:   git config --global init.defaultBranch <name>
hint: 
hint: Names commonly chosen instead of 'master' are 'main', 'trunk' and
hint: 'development'. The just-created branch can be renamed via this command:
hint: 
hint:   git branch -m <name>

Any idea why I would be getting this message when running nix develop?

Strangely enough, if I immediately exit out of the shell and run nix develop again, I don't get the message again.

I guess it is possible that this is caused by calling git in my shell's PROMPT_COMMAND, but it doesn't seem likely since i don't see this message when changing directories.

07:31:51
@Las:matrix.orgLas cdepillabout: This is an error internal to Nix. 07:42:10
@Las:matrix.orgLas Nix uses git internally when fetching Git repositories. 07:42:18
@Las:matrix.orgLas * cdepillabout: This is a warning internal to Nix. 07:42:55
@niksnut:matrix.orgniksnutI think this message is gone on master, see https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/457307:52:19
@rosariopulella:matrix.orgRosario Pulella changed their display name from rosariopulella to Rosuavio.10:38:26
@rosariopulella:matrix.orgRosario Pulella changed their display name from Rosuavio to Rosario Pulella.10:44:51
@cdepillabout:matrix.orgcdepillabout
In reply to @niksnut:matrix.org
I think this message is gone on master, see https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/4573
Ah great, thanks!
11:07:55
@lourkeur:nixos.devLouis Bettens joined the room.20:34:49
7 Oct 2021
@kadokusei10:matrix.orgkadokusei10 joined the room.09:41:19
8 Oct 2021
@florian:web3.foundationFlorian | W3F - OoO Mon/Tuenix now fetches submodules by default for flakes and I was wondering what would be the best way to expose all submodules for isolated use in the flake? My use case would be that in some cases, I just want my flake output on submodules, so I do not end up rebuilding them for all repo changes. 09:01:50
@florian:web3.foundationFlorian | W3F - OoO Mon/Tue * nix now fetches submodules by default for flakes and I was wondering what would be the best way to expose all submodules for isolated use in the flake? My use case would be that in some cases, I just want my flake ouput only depends on some submodules, but I do end up rebuilding for all repo changes.09:07:46
@Las:matrix.orgLas Florian | W3F - OoO Mon/Tue: Pretty sure that was reverted due to various issues. 11:09:40

There are no newer messages yet.


Back to Room ListRoom Version: 6