Nix Flakes | 874 Members | |
| 182 Servers |
| Sender | Message | Time |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2024 | ||
| Especially, for research reproduceability. | 20:04:52 | |
Another thing: installCheck phase is ran when doInstallCheck is set to true according to https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#var-stdenv-doInstallCheck, but not when cross-compiling. I can't get my installCheck phase to run in a flake that uses flake-utils. Is the cross-compiling kicking in? | 20:13:20 | |
I am building with nix build '#pkg.ver' therefore I am not really thinking I am cross-compiling. | 20:13:48 | |
In reply to @qu4pk4:matrix.orgthe schema forbids it. legacyPackages lets you put arbitrary data in, which is why Nixpkgs uses it | 20:15:37 | |
| qu4pk4: Eelco is working on a flake-schemas effort to make supporting various schemas in the the top-level outputs. Regardless, you can place a "lib" wherever you wish. Nixpkgs itself places "lib" output into the top-level of the flake. | 22:29:56 | |
| 12 Aug 2024 | ||
| Thanks | 07:44:21 | |
How to use passthru.tests for testing Flake package builds? My idea is to build static libraries and tests that the lib<name>.a indeed exists by compiling a simple source. | 07:45:44 | |
But pkgs.runCommand used in https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#var-meta-tests-nixos does not result in a derivation and therefore both nix run and nix build complain. | 07:46:46 | |
Or are passthru.tests somehow ran automatically on nix bulid '.#<pkg>'? | 07:48:45 | |
| 11:34:31 | ||
| 16:59:15 | ||
| 13 Aug 2024 | ||
| 15:06:42 | ||
| 15:06:45 | ||
| 21:58:50 | ||
| 14 Aug 2024 | ||
| 00:34:49 | ||
| 13:25:41 | ||
| 15 Aug 2024 | ||
| Hi, I am developing a pam module. How would I test the Nix module (and therefore the Pam module) without having to rebuild my system everytime I make a change and want to test it? Is there something clever I can do? | 14:04:48 | |
| You could use the nixos VM test (see the manual and the wiki about that) | 14:17:34 | |
| It could be hard to set the test up though (depending on what part of pam you want to test) | 14:18:25 | |
| It does sound rather complex but I'll at least have a look | 14:28:58 | |
| Ok, a simpler question: how would I add a new PAM rule in my NixOS config? | 14:40:36 | |
| I'm not so familiar with pam, but its probably listed in the option search? | 19:01:47 | |
| 16 Aug 2024 | ||
| 02:05:58 | ||
| 17 Aug 2024 | ||
| 04:15:46 | ||
| 12:36:27 | ||
I am having troubles building Java application with gradle2nix that needs sources from one of the submodules. The nix version is 2.42.2, which is after the .?submodules=1 being needed. I have read this https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/7862#issuecomment-1908577578 and what I think is going on is that the submodules aren't being needed and therefore aren't fetched (because they are fetched lazily). What is the canonical way to force them to evaluate? | 15:08:22 | |
* I am having troubles building Java application with gradle2nix that needs sources from one of the submodules. The nix version is 2.42.2, which is after the .?submodules=1 being needed. I have read this https://github.com/NixOS/nix/pull/7862#issuecomment-1908577578 and what I think is going on is that the submodules aren't being needed by the flake directly and therefore aren't fetched (because they are fetched lazily). What is the canonical way to force them to evaluate? | 15:10:19 | |
In reply to @qu4pk4:matrix.org Ah, it's the
| 15:50:30 | |
| 18 Aug 2024 | ||
| 14:17:29 | ||
| I am seeing a peculiar issue:
Has anyone ever seen this? (originally posted elsewhere but this room might be more appropriate) | 19:57:49 | |